From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F43431FB6 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:02:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPctn95epVLE for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0338431FAE for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:02:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.23.207] (dsl254-070-154.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.70.154]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 754E5F970; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:02:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F358601.9020504@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:02:57 -0500 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120125 Icedove/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build-Depend on libgmime-2.6-dev | libgmime2.4-dev References: <1328829620-28220-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <87lioaesmu.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:02:21 -0000 On 02/10/2012 03:57 PM, Tomi Ollila wrote: > For the time being, should the order be: > > - libgmime-2.4-dev, > + libgmime-2.4-dev | libgmime-2.6-dev, 2.6 is available and functional in unstable. I think we should prefer 2.6. This will enable (and encourage) us to approach S/MIME support too (which isn't offered in 2.4), as well as helping flush out any concerns with 2.6. Leaving 2.4-dev as an optional b-d will make backporting simpler, but i think we should try to use (and support) upstream's stable gmime branch. --dkg