From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E8F431FAE for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:34:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.218 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.218 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.219, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iOIihPJEUfB0 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from samir.ibcsolutions.de (samir.ibcsolutions.de [78.47.90.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2C7431FBD for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from g229133048.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.229.133.48] helo=[192.168.10.101]) by samir.ibcsolutions.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYh4O-0001Lc-KH; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:34:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4B5B0904.4010305@exys.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:34:44 +0100 From: Arvid Picciani Organization: Asgaard Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091215 Shredder/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carl Worth References: <4B4ED7E8.20501@exys.org> <878wc0623y.fsf@exys.org> <20100114183854.1d04f111@hikari> <87fx68e2am.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <878wbzx3td.wl%djcb@djcbsoftware.nl> <87my0frfnt.fsf@exys.org> <873a1xz71c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <4B5B07B3.7090709@exys.org> In-Reply-To: <4B5B07B3.7090709@exys.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: indexing mail? X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:34:54 -0000 On 01/23/2010 03:29 PM, Arvid Picciani wrote: >>> done >> >> I'm still not sure what is slow for you, > > scanning 60k mails. :D That's not fixable, other then by not doing that. > > but I'm also not sure how the above would help. > > It doesn't scan all 60K individually but only the single new one. Thunderfuck is a pain. it sent the mail with a different quoting then showing it, again. Desperatly need to get notmuch working :( -- Arvid Asgaard Technologies