Hi David,

> OK, with that setting I can duplicate the problem replying to encrypted
> HTML mail.
>
> It's also true that notmuch-reply doesn't include the content in the
> html version of the multipart/alternative. Unlike notmuch show, it
> doesn't have the ability to send parts later, so I guess that's a
> problem there.
>
> The following patch seems to fix it for me. What I haven't worked out is
> if it will break other things. Perhaps David E or Mark (in copy) can
> comment on whether this is a sensible change, given that we now give the
> user control of showing the part on the emacs side.
>
> diff --git a/notmuch-reply.c b/notmuch-reply.c
> index 3c6d685..cd88d79 100644
> --- a/notmuch-reply.c
> +++ b/notmuch-reply.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ notmuch_reply_format_sprinter(void *ctx,
>
>      /* Start the original */
>      sp->map_key (sp, "original");
> -    format_part_sprinter (ctx, sp, node, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE);
> +    format_part_sprinter (ctx, sp, node, TRUE, TRUE, TRUE);
>
>      /* End */
>      sp->end (sp);

I could have sworn that I replied to this thread months ago but can't find
a record it in the archives... I think I also missed David E's reply to
yours mentioning the patch from id:1459708823-1852-1-git-send-email-dme at
dme.org, so I'm following up...

With David E's patch, the decryption problem I reported is resolved.
However, I notice that this change hasn't yet been committed / pushed. Is
there a particular reason for this?

I'm currently maintaining a version of this patch compatible with the
current master which makes this change to notmuch-mua.el
notmuch-mua-reply() by adding (notmuch-show-process-crypto process-crypto)
before doing the show. I've attached that patch here.

I just wondered if we were going to see this pushed to master any time soon?

Cheers,
--  Matt