From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YNwrFdxzrV4VFgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:21:32 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id oEw4MOVzrV5VQQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:21:41 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3889409D7 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 13:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78A66DE0E8B; Sat, 2 May 2020 06:21:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H2UyFyakjj3U; Sat, 2 May 2020 06:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CCE6DE0A7F; Sat, 2 May 2020 06:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B99A6DE0A7F for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 06:21:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tk-e-aGB5dhD for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 06:21:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Greylist: delayed 445 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at arlo; Sat, 02 May 2020 06:21:29 PDT Received: from mariecurie.labrat.space (mariecurie.labrat.space [116.203.185.229]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFAE6DE09B0 for ; Sat, 2 May 2020 06:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from labrat.space (adsl-178-39-17-141.adslplus.ch [178.39.17.141]) by mariecurie.labrat.space (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14B9FC571AD; Sat, 2 May 2020 15:12:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=labrat.space; s=201904; t=1588425175; bh=2jtTjl0xwc6GMZ6plo7j4fFdUTQUeHMhdX587M/YcNg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:To:CC:Date: Subject:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Reply-To:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Message-ID:References; b=RzkJ9nP7lMOuvQdlKKjNP4ETMJHcJrXO/9txlBzxP3NAO1zAboK1oAZHohYznazGa UKsVa8J9G7Zu+vZM2r6uXAHAzIbSWdUWHVgrHb6hztSdqmTRXdCrRzYX01sjFDX2lh C2OxpOQOeeW9qKmQNCX7b31/QksnHogIjCeqWIPcoNmo5qEhGB8ZWDImpYz+6U3LA4 9Ay5e897LTqUR7MV1fKJqeQJ4MjuBS7KPSAUKhRoYrYEu8OEsvNe2/7FnMoV5J1nKz YVtiMTslRivaOo3wbKpT1s2ezwnDhUls4lMwFmEgbGE73nDEAQN3ubmntFzFqZRjCg 55qxJvtsXTvTg== Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 15:13:58 +0200 From: Reto To: Sean Whitton Subject: Re: notmuch and mailing lists Message-ID: <20200502131358.ciph4tv5dmzqdy54@feather.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Sean Whitton , notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <87o8r74fmz.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87o8r74fmz.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=labrat.space header.s=201904 header.b=RzkJ9nP7; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=labrat.space (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.09 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.46656996064802]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 27017(-0.18), country: US(-0.00), ip: 50.126.95.6(-0.47)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[50.126.95.6:server fail]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[labrat.space:s=201904]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[labrat.space:-]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[notmuchmail.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[50.126.95.6:server fail]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:27017, ipnet:50.126.64.0/18, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[reto@labrat.space,notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[178.39.17.141:received]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[notmuchmail.org:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[notmuch@notmuchmail.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[labrat.space : SPF not aligned (strict),none] X-TUID: fbLxFrHXJR9q On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:30:28PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I've not yet used NNTP to read mailing lists myself, but I think there > are limitations to the way I currently read lists What are you missing exactly? If we know what your actual problems are there might be better solutions forthcoming.