From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014186DE1687 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:41:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.043 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.043 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ncVGC1O3UQfh for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:41:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.171]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B4DE6DE167E for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from resomta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.233]) by resqmta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id mRHJeU4NJwp37mRHJewc3I; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:41:17 +0000 Received: from mail.tremily.us ([67.168.0.137]) by resomta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id mRFLe3zJWfjk5mRFLemCJL; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:39:16 +0000 Received: by mail.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3925F140D920; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:40:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:40:04 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor Cc: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Gmane vs. Mail Archive notmuch-report config Message-ID: <20180215214004.GK26497@valgrind.us> References: <20180215160140.21027-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20180215185629.GC26497@valgrind.us> <87po56nhql.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2pR2RtFp0tAjF3C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87po56nhql.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFqX/YdoCrbzgTBdVXPWbymqmVwdGNCWa7T09JjRkK9gc6Sgl1rcSUHSc2b9oHgY6zBv1E3le/NRwZ2dCmdhattXOwm6G0ra3xAGt8caZDwMKrzNEUGR GuyHJ6KIsbK0Ei4xQoI/8C629lZ2bRY4f4gPGNbW6u19/vXvU6RPLvWa3nUpC6qQmWXgfDzdMi538reEDRyHp1cs8MqP6fHRYsM= X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:41:21 -0000 --J2pR2RtFp0tAjF3C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:02:58PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2018-02-15 10:56:29 -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> - "message-url": "http://mid.gmane.org/{message-id}" > >> + "message-url": "https://mid.gmane.org/{message-id}" > > > > I was wondering whether it made sense to change these to something > > else with Gmane down. But it appears that Gmane is back up, possibly > > since ~2016-09-14 [1]). The current notmuch-report output [2] is > > linking to the Mail Archive though (e.g. [3]) and not to Gmane > > (e.g. [4]). Perhaps we want to revert 2d6500a0 (change mid link to > > mail-archive.com, 2017-03-19) and go back to Gmane? Or use one of the > > other notmuch-based archives that has been floating around on the list > > recently? >=20 > while i'm game to reconsider this (and clearly my work on > https://nmbug.notmuchmail.org/btsmail is intended for a future > replacement), i don't want to block the proposed patch from landing. > what did you think of the rest of the patch? :) No opinions on the rest of the patch ;). I'm generally in favor of HTTPS, but didn't check all the links and such. I just thought =E2=80=9Cwhy bother updating these if Gmane is down?=E2=80=9D and then found out that it was back up and that our notmuch-report wasn't using it. This =E2=80=9CGma= ne vs. Mail Archive notmuch-report config=E2=80=9D sub-thread is just about th= at, and not part of patch review. Cheers, Trevor --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --J2pR2RtFp0tAjF3C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEpgNNa8H/zemHkt2gprXBz9Wld7YFAlqF/jMACgkQprXBz9Wl d7brWA//XVO0E7WAIEIXaZ9uTZpOCXSWNgW+AM77yCRPHnRB1623NQ4xtCqZZGso ljA/RhBjhSNNEab0amxx8zcqVOIkZTWzIBk6+3MGNRQ2FdWeL8HcZ8zDxhhAP/nY CjcWtexh1q68FqyyZ0qvjsx2bpOjSrR2scT9J3pgjeJ3oY76MktDjc0vkzbnsOpl +vtDu6FzOWN8a2HVrb23jF0GDrew53UvdVa5DxIJQTI6m0VL0hUzyZzyRZ366YKB 4nmO05m4aSjeey+U57XbysWo2IDEpEn4pF+wd8pMg9uiPnp3jzo8grMWwctg5cpd aBK7Oo0cOhsVsCtWkK7S1qCkIfip2Pm2Na/kcsKrTRh6nNytTQ7OZHGuoOZqYXRt IR8k6WVY54J4x8fnyOqqCMrgf1iQAsN0rL3OVEMxAYBOxGEAnPeuupRIPokcKlqm DbokqhIZ82pPi6zWCQgvUV++URCm9jJfeiPW4QC2fh2Xf3cX63r9/CljDOgK6zMw 27j+mfFVjPieFLNaUSlxBxI/rQ2l94Ytm8RJTQXcToAP8S+ImZfWf0/D7kVbTuOo RZSu8h9uJc1mlMTJpIRBiknJGrnDMFh+WVF64HeUedM2Kg/HNaXcwoGYn3+Yxtuh ms4U2ZvHbJ6R1YwybrcL83Kcn8TVpSyp6DWr7Sz8BRcQlVortyY= =HP6J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2pR2RtFp0tAjF3C--