X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on shi.workgroup X-Spam-grfz-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=2.0 bayes=0.0000 tests=AWL=0.031,BAYES_00=-3.599,FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,SPF_FAIL=0.001 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 date="Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:04:26 +0200" languages= Envelope-to: grfz@localhost Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:04:19 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=shi.workgroup) by shi.workgroup with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QCC0T-0004yU-EE for grfz@localhost; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:34:21 +0200 Delivered-To: GMX delivery to telegraph@gmx.net Received: from pop.gmx.net by shi.workgroup with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.19) for (single-drop); Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:34:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2011 20:15:29 -0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (EHLO lists.gnu.org) [199.232.76.165] by mx0.gmx.net (mx040) with SMTP; 10 Apr 2011 22:15:29 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45444 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q912e-000695-PP for telegraph@gmx.net; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:15:28 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42637 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q90w4-0000gL-Oq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q90w3-0005GN-G7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:40 -0400 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:45329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q90w3-0005D3-CJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:39 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LJG009M9D9DEKK0@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:08:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: by alphaville.dokosmarshall.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDB32E25D1; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alphaville.dokosmarshall.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F1FE207E; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:00 -0400 (EDT) To: "Thomas S. Dye" From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [O] LaTeX export: inline markup underscore problem In-reply-to: Message from "Thomas S. Dye" of "Sun, 10 Apr 2011 09:36:35 -1000." References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 24.0.50 Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:00 -0400 Message-id: <1112.1302466080@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-Received-From: 206.46.173.3 Cc: Mauro Rovezzi , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, nicholas.dokos@hp.com X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: error4me@gmx.de Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+telegraph=gmx.net@gnu.org X-GMX-Antivirus: 0 (no virus found) X-GMX-Antispam: 0 (Mail was not recognized as spam); Detail=5D7Q89H36p5c/wJqTWc2KfAmv6U3syj2DinrxktPnaNZhfrNCczkB8SdMXDFwycd4V9CQ w8px7DbZJcTWciL08KzEgtQhRFGEK2QJMUC6s/EvqM6i7d6APK/zw34uNDbk2rQSs8r9bt2pcPbO fTxmpZYFtp5aXxPyRJw2T1hCiuybvgjpHnHrtu1Rm8u2WdPdd/CZun9aTDYFYcHH+7oTw==V1; Content-Length: 873 Content-Length: 852 Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Aloha Mauro, > > Please see > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.html#sec-17_2 > Excuse the intrusion, but I don't see anything in there that looks like a solution to the OP's problem (the undesired quoting of the underscore when exporting the org file to LaTeX): what am I missing? I was going to suggest that life would be much easier for the OP if he could change all underscores to some other character in his bibliography (I often see colons and minus signs used e.g.) That may or may not be possible of course, but if it is possible, it would be the simplest solution: the treatment of _ in the LaTeX exporter is often the source of frustration. That is not the fault of the exporter of course: TeX makes it very complicated to determine what the right thing to do is. Nick