* Mail archives in Git using ssoma
@ 2014-11-07 19:03 W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 4:36 ` W. Trevor King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: W. Trevor King @ 2014-11-07 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: notmuch; +Cc: Eric Wong
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7808 bytes --]
Hello everyone :),
I like Git, so when folks suggest storing things in Git, I'm usually
excited ;). Eric Wong has been working on some tools to store email
in a Git repository, and his client-side code is ssoma [1]. I wanted
a bit more metadata than the stock ssoma-mda [2], and ended up just
writing a ssoma-mda in Python [3]. It needs Python ≥3.4 and pygit2.
I had pygit2 already installed for Python 3.3 (which gave me a local
libgit2), so I used pip to install it for 3.4:
$ python3.4 -m ensurepip --user
$ pip3.4 install --user pygit2
Then I grabbed the archives, and pulled them into Git:
$ wget http://notmuchmail.org/archives/notmuch.mbox
$ git init --bare notmuch-archives.git
$ cd notmuch-archives.git
$ python3.4
>>> import email.utils
>>> import mailbox
>>> import ssoma_mda
>>> mbox = mailbox.mbox('../notmuch.mbox', factory=None, create=False)
>>> messages = sorted(mbox, key=lambda m: email.utils.mktime_tz(email.utils.parsedate_tz(m['date'])))
>>> for message in messages:
... if ((message['message-id'] == '<m2k4gmyjer.fsf@ecocode.net>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:23:34 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<4EDF728E.3050204@gmail.com>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:05:16 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == <4FE369F2.5080804@gmail.com>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:38:07 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<5122353D.4060601@gmail.com>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:06:12 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<CA+eQo_1hMsTD4+6ifqgEQXW0_qYXGOdfkO6tBuGQKV+W7OSaKA@mail.gmail.com>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:09:55 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<527B9E8C.5000001@krugs.de>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:07:32 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<1399645162-8653-1-git-send-email-wael.nasreddine@gmail.com>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Fri, 09 May 2014 14:19:36 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<m2mw9xkyvg.fsf@krugs.de>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] == 'Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:27:35 -0000') or
... (message['message-id'] == '<cover.1411379395.git.jani@nikula.org>' and
... message['X-List-Received-Date'] != 'Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:54:16 -0000')):
... continue
... ssoma_mda.deliver(message=message, once=True)
>>> ^D
On my 1.1GHz Intel Celeron 847 Sandy Bridge netbook, that took about
half an hour. The initial repository was large:
$ du -hs .
394M .
But packing it up made it small:
$ git gc --aggressive
du -hs .
51M .
With a few less images than the mbox:
$ git log --oneline | wc -l
19650
Compared with 19660 messages in the mbox at 107 MB (160 MB for the
associated Maildir).
The messages I dropped removed duplicate Message-IDs:
* id:m2k4gmyjer.fsf@ecocode.net had different received dates:
-X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:12:20 -0000
+X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:23:34 -0000
but no significant differences.
* id:4EDF728E.3050204@gmail.com had a real address in the
first-to-arrive version:
-X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:10:13 -0000
-> <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
an an obfuscated one in the second-to-arrive version:
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:05:16 -0000
+> <4winter-jNDFPZUTrfQBEfOqpokbeYV0Y/DQsy6Ps0AfqQuZ5sE@public.gmane.org>
* id:4FE369F2.5080804@gmail.com had the same:
-X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:37:54 -0000
-> <R.M.Krug@gmail.com
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:38:07 -0000
-> <mailto:R.M.Krug@gmail.com>> wrote:
* id:5122353D.4060601@gmail.com had different received dates:
-X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:06:05 -0000
+X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:06:12 -0000
but no significant differences.
* id:CA+eQo_1hMsTD4+6ifqgEQXW0_qYXGOdfkO6tBuGQKV+W7OSaKA@mail.gmail.com
had different MIME boundaries:
-Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be11ac45a0904db1f3428
-X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:09:46 -0000
+Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f646ff3faa11d04db1f3294
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:09:55 -0000
but no significant differences.
* id:527B9E8C.5000001@krugs.de had obfuscated addresses:
-X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:07:33 -0000
-> Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:07:32 -0000
+> Rainer M Krug <Rainer-vfylz/Ys1k4@public.gmane.org> writes:
* id:1399645162-8653-1-git-send-email-wael.nasreddine@gmail.com had
additional content in the later submission:
-Subject: [PATCH] Add Travis-CI config file.
-Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 07:19:22 -0700
-X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:19:36 -0000
- .travis.yml | 10 ++++++++++
- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
+Subject: [PATCH v2] Enable Travis-CI as a backup continuous integration
+ service.
+Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:44:50 -0700
+X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 21:45:16 -0000
+
+The v2 adds a notification section to send failure (or back to passing) notifications
+to the mailing list and to the IRC channel
+
+ .travis.yml | 13 +++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
* id:m2mw9xkyvg.fsf@krugs.de had an obfuscated adderss and different signature:
-X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:27:31 -0000
->> guyzmo <guyzmo@m0g.net> writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
-iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGrN3AAoJENvXNx4PUvmC4J0IAN9Wf+0ArvirJCoewItnEZoo
-ySg4VRP7uWVqDxHVl5N9XFv4YE2bZ2E2eMGvbo6v7I82lhqeR5dauZhlgCMki+ZI
+X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:27:35 -0000
+>> guyzmo <guyzmo-kMjww5mZloE@public.gmane.org> writes:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
+iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUGrN4AAoJENvXNx4PUvmC6LsIAIaFrd4MFnm8EixrAHPGfW6j
+L3KNG7Dv+hQuNRUN6qn+emZHI8wX4O74HOZOpZWkE09CmjkPJBmf7IuJwtz2ONbM
* id:cover.1411379395.git.jani@nikula.org came in three times, with
three dates, but no significant differences:
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:54:20 +0200
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:54:16 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:54:42 +0200
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:54:37 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:54:51 +0200
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:54:49 -0000
Anyhow, I've pushed the Git archive [4,5] if anyone wants to play
around with ssoma. I think this would be a nice backend for folks
building notmuch-based web archives, and pulling from Git is easier
than downloading a new mbox ;).
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: http://ssoma.public-inbox.org/README
[2]: http://public-inbox.org/meta/m/ec8f54cf6451eef6e9f59eff691cd9002f4fdf65.html
[3]: http://git.tremily.us/?p=ssoma-mda.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/python
I have an uncommitted patch to work around http://bugs.python.org/issue22684
[4]: http://git.tremily.us/?p=notmuch-archives.git
[5]: git://tremily.us/notmuch-archives.git
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: Mail archives in Git using ssoma
2014-11-07 19:03 Mail archives in Git using ssoma W. Trevor King
@ 2016-08-21 4:36 ` W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 9:48 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma (Docker image) W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 18:37 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma Eric Wong
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: W. Trevor King @ 2016-08-21 4:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: notmuch; +Cc: Eric Wong
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1549 bytes --]
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:03:21AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
> Eric Wong has been working on some tools to store email in a Git
> repository, and his client-side code is ssoma [1]. I wanted a bit
> more metadata than the stock ssoma-mda [2], and ended up just
> writing a ssoma-mda in Python [3]…
>
> Then I grabbed the archives, and pulled them into Git:
> …
> The messages I dropped removed duplicate Message-IDs:
> …
ssoma and public-inbox came up recently (with the end of Gmane) in
[1]. I've brought my archives [2] up to speed with a fresh mbox
downloaded today [3]. Beyond the ignored messages mentioned in my
initial email, I had to ignore:
* id:67EEA3E1-918F-47AE-8AD7-EF0A5923D800@m0g.net
Which had different headers up through:
-X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:49:49 -0000
+X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:50:34 -0000
but the same body in both instances.
I also had to remove two control characters:
$ tr -d '\034' <notmuch.mbox >notmuch-fixed.mbox
to get the mbox into a format that Python could parse without errors.
I've pushed the mbox → ssoma(ish) import script to the ‘import’ branch
of [2] if folks want to play around.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: id:20160820062931.GY30347@odin.tremily.us
[2]: git://tremily.us/notmuch-archives.git
[3]: http://notmuchmail.org/archives/notmuch.mbox
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail archives in Git using ssoma (Docker image)
2016-08-21 4:36 ` W. Trevor King
@ 2016-08-21 9:48 ` W. Trevor King
[not found] ` <20160821120852.GA12964@dcvr>
2016-08-21 18:37 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma Eric Wong
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: W. Trevor King @ 2016-08-21 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: notmuch; +Cc: David Bremner, Steven Allen, Tomi Ollila, Carl Worth, Eric Wong
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2208 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 09:36:31PM -0700, W. Trevor King wrote:
> [2]: git://tremily.us/notmuch-archives.git
This is the ssoma archive (with the data in it). I just set up a
basic HTTP archive (following [1]) based on a Docker image [2] (Gentoo
doesn't package all the Perl dependencies public-inbox needs).
Dockerfile for rebuilding the image is in [2]. I'm currently hosting
the archives (HTTP only) at [3]. Spinning that up from the Docker
image looks like:
$ mkdir srv
$ git clone --bare git://tremily.us/notmuch-archives.git srv/notmuch
$ echo 'Notmuch -- Just an email system' >srv/notmuch.git/description
$ git config -f srv/notmuch.git/config publicinbox.http http://tremily.us
$ git config -f srv/notmuch.git/config publicinbox.email notmuch@notmuchmail.org
$ docker run --name notmuch-archives -d -p 80:8080 -v ${PWD}/srv/:/srv/ wking/public-inbox
(although I'm using -p ###:8080 and have an Nginx reverse-proxy in
front). It's not updating automatically yet, but that will probably
look like:
1. Pull new mbox [4].
2. Import into notmuch-archives [5].
3. Re-run public-inbox-index (this could probably be via ‘docker exec …’.
But I'll have to test that to confirm. And ideally we'd be using
ssoma-mda or similar directly, instead of going through mbox, but I'd
rather get the official headers on the stored mail than be efficient
;).
One shift from Gmane's mid.gmane.org/… is that the public-inbox UI
Message-ID lookup is per-bucket, and public-inbox seems to be
encouraging per-list buckets.
And while I feel like I had a good grasp of the ssoma format two years
ago, I know very little about Perl and public-inbox. I'm sure you
could setup a public-inbox host that is more efficient than what's
currently in my Docker image.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: http://public-inbox.org/INSTALL
[2]: https://hub.docker.com/r/wking/public-inbox/
[3]: http://tremily.us/notmuch/
[4]: https://notmuchmail.org/archives/notmuch.mbox
[5]: id:20160821043631.GA2338@odin.tremily.us
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: Mail archives in Git using ssoma
2016-08-21 4:36 ` W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 9:48 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma (Docker image) W. Trevor King
@ 2016-08-21 18:37 ` Eric Wong
2016-08-21 20:28 ` W. Trevor King
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wong @ 2016-08-21 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W. Trevor King; +Cc: notmuch
"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:03:21AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > Eric Wong has been working on some tools to store email in a Git
> > repository, and his client-side code is ssoma [1]. I wanted a bit
> > more metadata than the stock ssoma-mda [2], and ended up just
> > writing a ssoma-mda in Python [3]…
Btw, for public-inbox, I'm using git-fast-import now, so imports
are a bit faster and $GIT_DIR/ssoma.index is no longer used.
This was crucial for getting git@vger archives imported in
a reasonable time.
public-inbox-* still keeps ssoma.index up-to-date for backwards
compatibility with ssoma, and will probably do so until 2020 or
later (there'll be a few years of deprecation notices)
So I or someone else needs to update Perl ssoma to use fast-import at
some point, too; and I suggest your python version do the same.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: Mail archives in Git using ssoma
2016-08-21 18:37 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma Eric Wong
@ 2016-08-21 20:28 ` W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 21:14 ` Eric Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: W. Trevor King @ 2016-08-21 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Wong; +Cc: notmuch, meta
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3363 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 06:37:04PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:03:21AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > > Eric Wong has been working on some tools to store email in a Git
> > > repository, and his client-side code is ssoma [1]. I wanted a bit
> > > more metadata than the stock ssoma-mda [2], and ended up just
> > > writing a ssoma-mda in Python [3]…
>
> Btw, for public-inbox, I'm using git-fast-import now, so imports are
> a bit faster and $GIT_DIR/ssoma.index is no longer used. This was
> crucial for getting git@vger archives imported in a reasonable time.
>
> public-inbox-* still keeps ssoma.index up-to-date for backwards
> compatibility with ssoma, and will probably do so until 2020 or
> later (there'll be a few years of deprecation notices)
>
> So I or someone else needs to update Perl ssoma to use fast-import
> at some point, too; and I suggest your python version do the same.
ssoma-mda imports 22k notmuch messages in around 15 minutes (with
profiling enabled), and:
$ python -m cProfile -o profile import.py notmuch.mbox
$ python -c "import pstats; p=pstats.Stats('profile'); p.sort_stats('cumulative').print_stats(10)"
Sun Aug 21 12:56:49 2016 profile
101823722 function calls (99078415 primitive calls) in 885.069 seconds
Ordered by: cumulative time
List reduced from 1145 to 10 due to restriction <10>
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
70/1 0.002 0.000 885.069 885.069 {built-in method exec}
1 0.111 0.111 885.069 885.069 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/import.py:9(<module>)
1 0.400 0.400 884.915 884.915 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/import.py:17(import_mbox)
22875 0.601 0.000 863.371 0.038 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/ssoma_mda.py:362(deliver)
22875 8.943 0.000 810.459 0.035 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/ssoma_mda.py:207(append)
22875 0.418 0.000 308.353 0.013 /home/wking/.local/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pygit2/index.py:146(write_tree)
22875 307.855 0.013 307.855 0.013 {built-in method git_index_write_tree}
22874 0.575 0.000 279.293 0.012 /home/wking/.local/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pygit2/index.py:238(diff_to_tree)
22874 278.501 0.012 278.501 0.012 {built-in method git_diff_tree_to_index}
22875 0.088 0.000 80.413 0.004 /home/wking/.local/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pygit2/index.py:99(read)
38 ms per ssoma delivery is probably fast enough, especially if you
are invoking ssoma-mda once per message, since process setup will take a similar amount of time:
$ time python -c 'print("hello")'
hello
real 0m0.016s
user 0m0.013s
sys 0m0.003s
It's possible that fast-import would shave a few ms off the pygit2
addition (I'm not sure, and maybe pygit2 is faster than fast-import).
But I doubt it matters enough either way to be worth changing unless
you are dealing with a really large corpus.
Cheers,
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: Mail archives in Git using ssoma
2016-08-21 20:28 ` W. Trevor King
@ 2016-08-21 21:14 ` Eric Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wong @ 2016-08-21 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W. Trevor King; +Cc: notmuch, meta
"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 06:37:04PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Btw, for public-inbox, I'm using git-fast-import now, so imports are
> > a bit faster and $GIT_DIR/ssoma.index is no longer used. This was
> > crucial for getting git@vger archives imported in a reasonable time.
>
> ssoma-mda imports 22k notmuch messages in around 15 minutes (with
> profiling enabled), and:
In contrast, git@vger is around 300K messages. LKML is well
into the millions, and I hope public-inbox (and git!) can handle
that one day, even on cheap hardware (haven't tried).
One problem I noticed with ssoma-mda is that it gets slower as
more messages get imported, since all those files sit in the
index, and the git index format is bad for incremental updates
with big, flat trees. Big trees are a general problem with git:
I'm now storing blob IDs directly in Xapian and will be
using them more to avoid tree lookups. tree creation
lookups degrade the same way the index does as they
get bigger.
Currently it's using 2/38 of the SHA-1 like git loose
objects; a goal might be to move towards supporting 2/2/36
(or deeper) as Jeff noted substantial object traversal
improvements:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20160805092805.w3nwv2l6jkbuwlzf@sigill.intra.peff.net/
Of course, support for 2/38 will be retained for old
archives/messages.
> $ python -m cProfile -o profile import.py notmuch.mbox
> $ python -c "import pstats; p=pstats.Stats('profile'); p.sort_stats('cumulative').print_stats(10)"
> Sun Aug 21 12:56:49 2016 profile
>
> 101823722 function calls (99078415 primitive calls) in 885.069 seconds
>
> Ordered by: cumulative time
> List reduced from 1145 to 10 due to restriction <10>
>
> ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
> 70/1 0.002 0.000 885.069 885.069 {built-in method exec}
> 1 0.111 0.111 885.069 885.069 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/import.py:9(<module>)
> 1 0.400 0.400 884.915 884.915 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/import.py:17(import_mbox)
> 22875 0.601 0.000 863.371 0.038 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/ssoma_mda.py:362(deliver)
> 22875 8.943 0.000 810.459 0.035 /home/wking/src/notmuch/notmuch-archives.git/ssoma_mda.py:207(append)
> 22875 0.418 0.000 308.353 0.013 /home/wking/.local/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pygit2/index.py:146(write_tree)
> 22875 307.855 0.013 307.855 0.013 {built-in method git_index_write_tree}
> 22874 0.575 0.000 279.293 0.012 /home/wking/.local/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pygit2/index.py:238(diff_to_tree)
> 22874 278.501 0.012 278.501 0.012 {built-in method git_diff_tree_to_index}
It looks like writing the index is already the slowest, here, in
terms of total time, too. It might be interesting if you
profiled each *-mda invocation to see the degradation from the
first to last message.
> 22875 0.088 0.000 80.413 0.004 /home/wking/.local/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pygit2/index.py:99(read)
>
> 38 ms per ssoma delivery is probably fast enough, especially if you
Not even close for me :)
> are invoking ssoma-mda once per message, since process setup will take a similar amount of time:
>
> $ time python -c 'print("hello")'
> hello
>
> real 0m0.016s
> user 0m0.013s
> sys 0m0.003s
>
> It's possible that fast-import would shave a few ms off the pygit2
> addition (I'm not sure, and maybe pygit2 is faster than fast-import).
> But I doubt it matters enough either way to be worth changing unless
> you are dealing with a really large corpus.
One key feature is fast-import avoids writing an index entirely.
I think pygit2 would have to learn that, too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-07 1:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-07 19:03 Mail archives in Git using ssoma W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 4:36 ` W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 9:48 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma (Docker image) W. Trevor King
[not found] ` <20160821120852.GA12964@dcvr>
2016-08-21 13:49 ` David Bremner
2016-09-07 1:23 ` Eric Wong
2016-08-21 17:36 ` W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 18:28 ` Eric Wong
2016-08-21 18:37 ` Mail archives in Git using ssoma Eric Wong
2016-08-21 20:28 ` W. Trevor King
2016-08-21 21:14 ` Eric Wong
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).