From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AED2431FBD for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:15:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D0qR9VKyON9G for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:15:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.48]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C5D431FBC for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:15:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Pa2C1n0061HzFnQ55aFZAK; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:15:33 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PaFY1n00K152l3L3aaFYEw; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:15:33 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF164FFB78A; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:15:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1391811331; bh=1VqKNEnhKh/4CIA8rcaKEaejKCobEZV67QwQAyHwjrc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=lzZmqmrqXKLhO1wyF7SDfM122YZaHuB2vVB3eG/e2pR6ArWRovXyO+pILS2ulDKEO OzaEdKp/BoX1W92qAqTskTpUYFmurxAZmoYf05xBeIVemM1pHdkswx2uB49HBCcY4P oT+Rs/9MRa72Jf30vgS9JD2rsmpzUTb4o+wrYa0A= Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:15:31 -0800 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general refactoring Message-ID: <20140207221531.GA17142@odin.tremily.us> References: <20140204005331.GQ14197@odin.tremily.us> <20140204161142.GS14197@odin.tremily.us> <20140204191453.GV14197@odin.tremily.us> <20140205153127.GK14197@odin.tremily.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140205153127.GK14197@odin.tremily.us> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391811333; bh=FwZ5rg8d1ekIUCJFSmiyttrUwuz7+UGQDT0fQBZkSFE=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DqxhahGWP5g8b1ICm8NEulobj2SPympomxdsiSsMNAkcxltSZ0a7A1GikFihWb18C 1U5fpGyzgm0CB5DYKJxbi7Zw2G/m9bVU9NEeSKAbaXv7sWu77WUQrx5TPsYv7AYwWp zxshm/ou6ALT1Y10cNkD90HG6Q92rKLrBCOPzy8NQHpVreallbvwLzX4iePflQtkWH UGzMrNCizu7ZUytkf9Rn30Hf7B81+pNFiPto9cRC3ol0sueD6/Uri+Qfs/GQEeBdv9 mXEwhVfKKZ5mNNmP3uqkeYkMOZXlMSUJSwwp+9KXkw0ouY1IaPOSwMfIRqYzeogXwk U4xxR4Z2pO0UQ== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 22:15:43 -0000 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:31:27AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:24:56PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > > Forgot to mention that the <, >, & etc. characters could also be > > encoded in this patch series (to <, >, & etc.) >=20 > Good point. I'll xml.sax.saxutils.escape the message-id, from, and > subject at the end of HtmlPage._message_display_data, and squash that > into the Page / HtmlPage commit. I added this as a new commit instead of squashing (since the escaping wasn't present in the original nmbug-status), and also pushed the color and radius reductions [1] to my nmbug-status-python3 branch. Is this at the point where I should push v2 to the list, or do we want to wait for more feedback first? Cheers, Trevor [1]: http://mid.gmane.org/20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS9VsCAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtnzUP/2W0N0IoSiQ+GQZ+y0E5xm0O UoH2DETKvbhuk3a6OMTblCostJdPq3OsS6N7LynYvn78zfHbr/czlqIgL5jno8xa 4a2BMNJtf+Z1R4M5bAf+pcOYqB42lIyZR5Of5G9e2yVCwYTHxQMC9E8OdVOjNb2L 8cn9fyhIWHYkQ3AYmpXeXuGLKcxzRK7OtqtE+cXAkYZ8tbwPmaJJEs2l7smfkIf/ jNGhPail2PhvJ8dOdRvIK0jiuSHEyjR/g5FXhtHFKHwbaO3nbKpgVt4x28ezcW6Y UlsRI9ZDbXDsK+80AGJqNXtRzGkH2DSgWOhCul5NaTY0kn0EFdwgqPR8RNqZhVnN wb/mJkWZQtGZCqrG8+Kil1uRmS1klotoEHv9Dh53c6Hlssyc4QEQGSLGBYAAVJcr xUe8an/HKzj2sYoAEbFWmgRYW88GLJbL8xPuWy9f1Mksemvpij2OgIwhZubBg5vu IQWyY23F5U3Fh1BbF/liAmEpXXzaszrBBQ+o/BUUEqIeaMzzJTfIP1NeX55K9RaK dvP9G1yK6p33mxEGkiQDRUkvNbFscZju+WEbQrmCk9vGlLHijNYDZghzLMnLaOqM PsVnEBZsAyH3J0YHRC+trKO9i3Z8N6fBUwpksJG2w9VWKUfLXcmShfAU63+uHckC hfpxSQd+n0nVHiIuLIsb =Ka63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--