From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7A6431FBD for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:54:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSrdw7EuwDqv for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9B7431FBC for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:53:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from boo.workgroup ([87.187.157.204]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0McDl1-1VpFO30hVP-00JcBr for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:48:48 +0100 Received: from grfz by boo.workgroup with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W7bJa-0008NU-1l; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:48:42 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 02:48:12 +0100 From: Gregor Zattler To: notmuch Subject: Re: Bug?: notmuch-search-show-thread shows several threads; only one containing matching messages Message-ID: <20140127014812.GE10844@boo.workgroup> Mail-Followup-To: notmuch References: <87mx9avbc1.fsf@praet.org> <20120129234213.GB11460@shi.workgroup> <87zkd5655g.fsf@praet.org> <20120130190425.GB13521@shi.workgroup> <878vkoev95.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <20120130223416.GA26239@shi.workgroup> <874nvcekjk.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87lhy5pko1.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20140126212604.GC10844@boo.workgroup> <87r47ul364.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r47ul364.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: error4me@gmx.de X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:sCwX+AltMkdyAnsIzEFItDMaNYkauo7lUcs/hG94rWNIBpJfn/k 64K0S7iUsW5XVhp0BLIzsesmTE38arcU4ym9C4XB+gbhJUU1ClMq7Mleq1Z1ZIVSa9rGgeg ei1v+I3E193W/syv3Qnidq/37GawMgh7FeLD2jqgm9edT0SfzfqfY0dqKppslcWe6Di6XoW wj7ggXK1niTwxpZbVjr9w== X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 01:54:00 -0000 Hi David, * David Bremner [26. Jan. 2014]: > Gregor Zattler writes: > >> Today I produced another mbox with the very same command but with >> a now larger email corpus freshly indexed with a fresh notmuch. >> The mbox contains (according to mutt) 507 messages in 34 threads. >> One of them is the thread I searched for. >> >> I grepped for the 7 subjects within the 34 subjects and only 5 >> showed up. > > I don't know what you mean here. Grepped where? in the raw messages? With mutt I had a view at the collapsed 7 respective 34 threads. One then sees the very first E-Mails of a thread and among other information their subjects. Via editing I produced two lists with subjects and then searched each of the 7 in the list with the 34. >> If somebody want's to dig into this: I can provide the two >> mboxes. >> >> Disclaimer: Many of the emails which arrived before the problem >> report are not the exact same than then, because since the I >> mangled them with a script. This should have not changed the >> threading but I cannot be 100% sure. But if it's important for >> further investigation I'm probably able to reproduce the status >> quo of the email corpus then from my backups. > > If it's currently not working then I guess your current corpus should be > fine. It would probably help to restate what exactly is wrong. There was > a lot of discussion, and the concrete problem I saw identified (in > id:874nvcekjk.fsf@qmul.ac.uk ) was that certain malformed In-reply-to > headers were causing unrelated threads to merge. Yes. I understood the commit message of the commit you referenced in the email I answered to, that now notmuch uses Reference: headers to do the threading. I had a quick view at the References header in the mbox file and none looked suspicious. Ciao, Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-