From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F130C431FC0 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 05:28:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GdJ4+2HSXQn for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 05:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at (danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.168.64]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0823C431FBD for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 05:28:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by danbala.ifoer.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 116) id 669F6390DA4; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:28:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:28:33 +0100 From: Thomas Klausner To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: notmuch-0.16: realpath() compatibility issue; clang visibility problem Message-ID: <20140104132833.GZ27614@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> References: <20140103214735.GG27614@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> <20140104125358.GW27614@danbala.tuwien.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 13:28:42 -0000 On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 03:06:38PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > The linux namual page (*) has good explanation of this in the BUGS section > > (*) http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/realpath.3.html > > After reading that I think fixing that is not as simple as your previous > patch does it -- so probably you just have to keep patching your system > until NetBSD library realpath() is POSIX.1-2008 -compatible. Ok, so it's not that easy in general. On the other hand, I wonder how many systems support POSIX.1-2008 realpath() :) > Note that having users' own patches in their systems is not uncommon > at all :D I've filed a bug report in the meantime: http://gnats.netbsd.org/48497 Thanks for the comments, Thomas