From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1B431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id qgHu2+Cpxj8M for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat,  2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.160.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F99431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat,  2 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ro8so2432653pbb.18
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Yw6jyLo4T2qD9BVoK5vTGA7MbZRztmxMk/xN4JbaQhc=;
	b=uVXkRGa3fw0MlQtFGHhbUE43WFbtGoesRYX3bq2MeeL6Ilde9Bwyw+Dv9oby2iW0mc
	4Hjq5Ohb8p592zdotM7HzQ15fA9WqT0KveT0hR603fRvdx2xZB75w6Rqodo93Ty+WRMP
	awVxOkVd1Z6U+lS5P6PVjo1mac8N21eIFPWNV2Wsz+qRbmsPry7PMuFQGM0ivI/Bodg7
	npRvol6pISOEDxowm/FauztuvbaZh0Lnebloc/AycmHzEiRlCz9qaIF5YP7MHKOkkCaP
	ZPL3UGeyjz08EMpv2xM5FazJ2mv/L7+GB04tj52NrxGeBq1XjKcCsWuEsESkFV6ZGkW3
	d4tg==
X-Received: by 10.66.4.193 with SMTP id m1mr25243093pam.214.1362272871134;
	Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.
	[220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
	rr14sm17045838pbb.34.2013.03.02.17.07.48
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:07:45 +1100
Message-ID: <20130303120745.GA4884@hili.localdomain>
From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply
In-Reply-To: <f9c7258be72bec0b174553db0410c29eba2745fa.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>
References: <5eaa3acc22ee5513bdce5ab931b7a79ade880e06.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>
	<f9c7258be72bec0b174553db0410c29eba2745fa.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:07:52 -0000

On Sat,  2 Mar 2013 21:55:21 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> Use Mail-Followup-To header to determine recipients according to
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html if configured and present in the
> message being replied to.

I would like to see an option to --reply-to=list that, as far as
possible, does the right thing.  If we had that, do we need
reply.honor_followup_to?

Peter