From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F03431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id tHQXn9IdO9qF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
	[209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B81431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so627945wid.11
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id
	:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=WTygxvZQkLaWmUbTDcxBEa0Gm5Ot6FbYyxEmCoD8/zs=;
	b=YnZ+2z8MCPcMgIduPoUQht3NCRY67r2YOKOsApCHYb2MMVyuOYtHlPuVEfI0XK8G3Q
	aObm0Et5VjLtFfSHqZ3XrfNnoJgA42aa7zNmmq11KjhAN1U/XGWxvEWbK9C/3JcEH0Fq
	fMuf1JdgczgS0pT9fzhDUOeI9e0W08Iv3vVGoS8uGPlxkE981RHOsRWUy4DwuzCXrBYi
	gvvcDN9cqxZsv9Q0gx0aEwJJoBXSwTsV3sm/6rfzEyB+diewkd0loh5VrO0fRq31qpQZ
	f2VdnlWm4VE6qnaZ/RiY4bShC9uk+DBdNZf8PVNFSDp5xAP2+bXFoypErNAhEq3btlkb
	nGxw==
X-Received: by 10.195.13.11 with SMTP id eu11mr1336196wjd.39.1360896340728;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuru.dyndns-at-home.com
	(AAnnecy-651-1-327-76.w90-36.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.36.246.76])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex15sm2502101wid.5.2013.02.14.18.45.38
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Sender: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:45:35 +0100
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: notmuch-mutt: Use of uninitialized value.
Message-ID: <20130215024535.GA3423@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com>
Mail-Followup-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
References: <20130212005801.GA8419@soarin> <20130213223535.GA3258@zaogao.lan>
	<20130213233657.GA4489@soarin> <20130214083713.GA4123@upsilon.cc>
	<20130214230651.GA3247@zaogao.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130214230651.GA3247@zaogao.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Cc: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:45:44 -0000

Hi Kevin and others,

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:06:51PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> 
> Here are some proposed improved macros.  (I'll attach a patch file in
> another email.)  Despite my earlier warning about not line-breaking
> macros, these are getting a bit unreadable.  We may want to see
> if/where we can safely line-break them.

I find sticking by the rule "do not introduce whitespaces to make it
readable" very useful in multi-line macros.  For example,

macro index <key> "<some-long-function>some text<another-function>\
continuation<finally-the-end>"

the above is preferable over,

macro index <key> "<some-long-function>some text<another-function> \
                   continuation<finally-the-end>"

Hope this helps,

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.