From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1020B431FBF for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:12:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8hkdFXT3UQM for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.12]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760EF431FAF for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7f286d000000ee3-46-508daddefd47 Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id DE.CE.03811.EDDAD805; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:12:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q9SMCjnf018270; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:12:46 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q9SMCh0T015361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:12:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSb60-0002Ko-Di; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:12:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:12:40 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Andrei POPESCU Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] automatic tagging based on imap maildir Message-ID: <20121028221240.GC15377@mit.edu> References: <1351208039-32293-1-git-send-email-taesoo@mit.edu> <20121026171024.30658.84119@localhost> <877gqc7s67.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20121027044128.GB12051@taesoo.org> <87vcdw5atd.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20121028100324.GF6431@sid.nuvreauspam> <20121028153138.GB15377@mit.edu> <20121028214423.GE15580@sid.nuvreauspam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121028214423.GE15580@sid.nuvreauspam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpmleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT1723tjfAYNl1TYtVE6Qtrt+cyezA 5LFz1l12j2erbjEHMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZZy/fYyx4DF7xYNlsQ2MPWxdjJwcEgImEpf2 3YGyxSQu3FsPZHNxCAnsY5R4vuISE4SzgVFiwfTvUJmTTBJHj8xlhHCWMEp8WL+IBaSfRUBV YubEV2Cz2AQ0JLbtX84IYosI6Ep0vjrABGIzC0hLfPvdDGYLCzhIrF+5nR3E5hXQkXi6fzEL xNDTTBJ7ZtxmgUgISpyc+YQFollL4sa/l0DNHGCDlv/jAAlzCphKtM3bxwxiiwqoSEw5uY1t AqPQLCTds5B0z0LoXsDIvIpRNiW3Sjc3MTOnODVZtzg5MS8vtUjXUC83s0QvNaV0EyMorDkl eXYwvjmodIhRgINRiYf3QkFPgBBrYllxZe4hRkkOJiVRXs41vQFCfEn5KZUZicUZ8UWlOanF hxglOJiVRHiXcgPleFMSK6tSi/JhUtIcLErivJdTbvoLCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbBZGU4OJQkeJmB 8SskWJSanlqRlplTgpBm4uAEGc4DNFwLpIa3uCAxtzgzHSJ/ilFRSpz3BMhFAiCJjNI8uF5Y 2nnFKA70ijCvIUg7DzBlwXW/AhrMBDRYhw9scEkiQkqqgZGrv6vn2tav/BwTDC6Z2PQ9P6vq KDDX7p8Xd9LUJ8ubPCZGGyStsNjYvFHoyqGyO8Fve1557H0jzhy/8OwkxkuFYj8rHhUwiPRb rlp/oPbPHLV5utzHKhesUeJbFlKo+5Xp5h1O7Qu6z9rZUktCUpbmnpvLMG3XM5bLPGvqzC+L vDC/ZXaKtUOJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCRezJLFgMAAA== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 22:12:48 -0000 Quoth Andrei POPESCU on Oct 28 at 11:44 pm: > On Du, 28 oct 12, 11:31:38, Austin Clements wrote: > > > > Why does that cause you to not receive mailing lists? (Or did I > > misinterpret your statement?) > > Yes. The main deterrent in Gmail silently dropping my own postings > returning via the list, because it considers it identical to the sent > message. Ah. And I assume you want to see those in your inbox even if they're not a reply to some other message in your inbox? I do recall Gmail suppressing list reflections. Though I think that, by default, notmuch *will* put your own list postings in your inbox. Assuming the list sends the message back to you (not all do), and assuming your notmuch new.tags contains inbox, notmuch will simply see it as a new message and tag it inbox. If you have Fcc setup in your frontend of choice to save sent messages in a folder indexed by notmuch, then it should likewise tag the message inbox as soon as it indexes it.