unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: emacs: run list-processes after accept-process-output in emacs 23.1
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:55:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817185500.GP11179@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m27gsz2se2.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>

Quoth Tomi Ollila on Aug 16 at 10:44 am:
> On Mon, Aug 13 2012, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> 
> > Quoth Tomi Ollila on Aug 05 at  2:13 pm:
> >> When running emacs tests using emacs 23.1.1 the tests block (until timeout)
> >> when emacs function (notmuch-test-wait) is called.
> >> 
> >> There is an emacs bug #2930 titled:
> >> 23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinel
> >> 
> >> It seems this is present in emacs 23.1.
> >> 
> >> Calling list-processes after accept-process-output seems work around
> >> this problem; in case Emacs version is 23.1 a defadvice is activated
> >> to do just that.
> >
> > Should this workaround perhaps go in notmuch-test-wait directly,
> > instead of being implemented as advice?  
> 
> This way the fact that this is workaround for bug that exists only in
> 23.1(*) is emphasized; The notmuch-test-wait can exist in a (simpler)
> format where it doesn't need to know about this bug.

Okay.

> (*) This bug probably exists in emacs 22 but the MUA has not worked
> on emacs 22 at least for a year now.
> 
> > If we do want to keep it as advice, should it go in notmuch-lib.el
> > along with the few other compatibility functions?
> 
> In tests we have fixed environment where we can write workarounds
> as "global" advices. If we did this in notmuch-lib.el we'd be changing
> users' environment, possibly causing surprises...

Oh, right, of course.  I'd forgotten that this was in test-lib.el and
not in the general notmuch Emacs code.

> ... but neither sleep-for or accept-process-output are used in 
> any of the notmuch elisp code so such "fixes" are not needed now...
> 
> ... and this would ever be a problem, we might already support only
> emacs 24 or newer >;) ...
> 
> Tomi

Series LGTM.

> >> ---
> >> 
> >> Thanks to Austin for the comments and IRC discussions on the matter.
> >> 
> >>  test/test-lib.el |    8 ++++++++
> >>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/test/test-lib.el b/test/test-lib.el
> >> index 52d9936..4330352 100644
> >> --- a/test/test-lib.el
> >> +++ b/test/test-lib.el
> >> @@ -35,6 +35,16 @@
> >>      "Disable yes-or-no-p before executing kill-emacs"
> >>      (defun yes-or-no-p (prompt) t)))
> >>  
> >> +;; Emacs bug #2930:
> >> +;;	23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinels
> >> +;; seems to be present in Emacs 23.1.
> >> +;; Running `list-processes' after `accept-process-output' seems to work
> >> +;; around this problem.
> >> +(if (and (= emacs-major-version 23) (= emacs-minor-version 1))
> >> +  (defadvice accept-process-output (after run-list-processes activate)
> >> +    "run list-processes after executing accept-process-output"
> >> +    (list-processes)))
> >> +
> >>  (defun notmuch-test-wait ()
> >>    "Wait for process completion."
> >>    (while (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-17 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-05 11:13 [PATCH 1/2] test: emacs: call accept-process-output in notmuch-test-wait Tomi Ollila
2012-08-05 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] test: emacs: run list-processes after accept-process-output in emacs 23.1 Tomi Ollila
2012-08-13 15:16   ` Austin Clements
2012-08-16  7:44     ` Tomi Ollila
2012-08-17 18:55       ` Austin Clements [this message]
2012-08-05 21:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] test: emacs: call accept-process-output in notmuch-test-wait Jameson Graef Rollins
2012-08-29 22:11 ` David Bremner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120817185500.GP11179@mit.edu \
    --to=amdragon@mit.edu \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    --cc=tomi.ollila@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).