unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: emacs: run list-processes after accept-process-output in emacs 23.1
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:16:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120813151613.GN11179@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1344165182-29246-2-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>

Quoth Tomi Ollila on Aug 05 at  2:13 pm:
> When running emacs tests using emacs 23.1.1 the tests block (until timeout)
> when emacs function (notmuch-test-wait) is called.
> 
> There is an emacs bug #2930 titled:
> 23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinel
> 
> It seems this is present in emacs 23.1.
> 
> Calling list-processes after accept-process-output seems work around
> this problem; in case Emacs version is 23.1 a defadvice is activated
> to do just that.

Should this workaround perhaps go in notmuch-test-wait directly,
instead of being implemented as advice?  If we do want to keep it as
advice, should it go in notmuch-lib.el along with the few other
compatibility functions?

> ---
> 
> Thanks to Austin for the comments and IRC discussions on the matter.
> 
>  test/test-lib.el |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/test-lib.el b/test/test-lib.el
> index 52d9936..4330352 100644
> --- a/test/test-lib.el
> +++ b/test/test-lib.el
> @@ -35,6 +35,16 @@
>      "Disable yes-or-no-p before executing kill-emacs"
>      (defun yes-or-no-p (prompt) t)))
>  
> +;; Emacs bug #2930:
> +;;	23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinels
> +;; seems to be present in Emacs 23.1.
> +;; Running `list-processes' after `accept-process-output' seems to work
> +;; around this problem.
> +(if (and (= emacs-major-version 23) (= emacs-minor-version 1))
> +  (defadvice accept-process-output (after run-list-processes activate)
> +    "run list-processes after executing accept-process-output"
> +    (list-processes)))
> +
>  (defun notmuch-test-wait ()
>    "Wait for process completion."
>    (while (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-13 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-05 11:13 [PATCH 1/2] test: emacs: call accept-process-output in notmuch-test-wait Tomi Ollila
2012-08-05 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] test: emacs: run list-processes after accept-process-output in emacs 23.1 Tomi Ollila
2012-08-13 15:16   ` Austin Clements [this message]
2012-08-16  7:44     ` Tomi Ollila
2012-08-17 18:55       ` Austin Clements
2012-08-05 21:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] test: emacs: call accept-process-output in notmuch-test-wait Jameson Graef Rollins
2012-08-29 22:11 ` David Bremner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120813151613.GN11179@mit.edu \
    --to=amdragon@mit.edu \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    --cc=tomi.ollila@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).