From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FEB431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  8 Aug 2012 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id aeWOa0f-6nWj for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed,  8 Aug 2012 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com
	[209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B64431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  8 Aug 2012 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so1726183pbb.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=xCv0z7h5gQXJ+GkzpznTEiAn/9caTFgvBm0M2UJR0Cc=;
	b=EJzZMidTEe3PPu4fj3nLd/V9T9OHOXS9l5rrVMy5DYzJkOiskZSiu+gp9kc6KMpOzn
	XCqb9j+osIPzQXQa6Gk3yz2vr1h5gcWD7fH8moXSvF5DxPHHeB7UVgAil+huuIOhIJHZ
	CZaqJOjbnEkWAZUGkGEkHSGtZBZGgtJnhaf/S0QAOdTgSCVY1m1nsFJosN9/CiupXpkG
	22o3R8UjO7QL9Wgo1YnlDiJ8QxaJR7T+/qLMafVsuTyi7VCA89Ib2kK2YbN04XbBU+RL
	gXg+GbPE4YZsGkLDDPuy4Xha0F8N37KMucD0Hy8XLu+Bg36+q3rMRPaPaC7okq9XLx/R
	kjDQ==
Received: by 10.68.229.2 with SMTP id sm2mr35816799pbc.57.1344429070428;
	Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.
	[220.233.42.215])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nr8sm9897154pbc.43.2012.08.08.05.31.07
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:31:02 +1000
Message-ID: <20120808223102.GB2353@hili.localdomain>
From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] show: indicate length of omitted body content (json)
In-Reply-To: <87fw7ymhn1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
References: <1344151345-25411-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>
	<87fw7ymhn1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:31:11 -0000

On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:01:06 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I have two minor queries: do you think omitted text/html parts should
> also have the length given? Or even should it always be sent? But I am
> happy with it as is.

It could be added.  I wouldn't have much use for it myself.
text/html parts should usually be small enough that it doesn't matter,
and I never retrieve them when there is a text/plain alternative.

Peter