From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AE1431FB6 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nn246AbxbId0 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A209F431FAE for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so13319298pbb.26 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tx0Ceeu51/tA59K/OKJ3w6/z5tceQjfdTz+xpfGQZkw=; b=vT1znrPQlgAjWhr29KEIs2OEQGgjsg9trGEJXei1ewXY57+y9pPs8nCxvsaq3nKuWl OXM03TFj9uJu0AAEvZz8ThnXduQt5SvhfgmXnLdkIlUgpSqxuSSbD6GH306El/rc24nC wxiCJbTnkUL5aFN7G7rrz9vTqOV5HiNqpXVa4kbpoGVgES7R99kKo1CuJi7gL+1sqoLJ YsIEjX3KOhHqslsp6pJ6DWlY3LXPvubdqBea9DrjxqIUXW32VHYTrqEYw9xYgmrZZSbD 1gyAfmj0B4qTqYeGZOTxcXEwKW9ZVQq118g/TJGGagfDwJ+/pwsQn/bZfXjmmmefbsQg 460A== Received: by 10.68.219.162 with SMTP id pp2mr16139802pbc.85.1341390305602; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv8sm17276798pbc.53.2012.07.04.01.25.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:25:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 18:24:59 +1000 Message-ID: <20120704182459.GI2342@hili.localdomain> From: Peter Wang To: Jameson Graef Rollins Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers In-Reply-To: <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com> <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain> <87pq8c6zad.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:25:11 -0000 On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:22:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03 2012, Peter Wang wrote: > > I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply. > > Given that there have been requests to see a lot of other headers as > well, we probably need to have a discussion about which ones are worth > of emitting, and how we give the user some more general control to see > the ones they want. Either that or we just emit them all? If we start with the obvious: notmuch show --output-headers=date,from,subject,to,cc,reply-to ... with the default being the current set. Emitting everything would be easier but seems wasteful. I just looked at a random message: in RFC822 syntax the header is 4073 bytes, and the body is 1116 bytes. Keeping only the fields that notmuch emits reduces the header to 295 bytes. Reply-To is 92 bytes, but not every message has that. Peter