Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] cli: modify mime_node_context to use the new notmuch_crypto_t

[Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>]

Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on May 18 at 10:32 am:
> This simplifies some more interfaces and gets rid of another #ifdef.
> ---
>  mime-node.c |   22 ++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mime-node.c b/mime-node.c
> index 183ff5d..3dda900 100644
> --- a/mime-node.c
> +++ b/mime-node.c
> @@ -33,12 +33,7 @@ typedef struct mime_node_context {
>      GMimeMessage *mime_message;
>  
>      /* Context provided by the caller. */
> -#ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
> -    GMimeCryptoContext *cryptoctx;
> -#else
> -    GMimeCipherContext *cryptoctx;
> -#endif
> -    notmuch_bool_t decrypt;
> +    notmuch_crypto_t *crypto;
>  } mime_node_context_t;
>  
>  static int
> @@ -113,8 +108,7 @@ mime_node_open (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message,
>  	goto DONE;
>      }
>  
> -    mctx->cryptoctx = crypto->gpgctx;
> -    mctx->decrypt = crypto->decrypt;
> +    mctx->crypto = crypto;
>  
>      /* Create the root node */
>      root->part = GMIME_OBJECT (mctx->mime_message);
> @@ -190,7 +184,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
>  
>      /* Handle PGP/MIME parts */
>      if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_ENCRYPTED (part)
> -	&& node->ctx->cryptoctx && node->ctx->decrypt) {
> +	&& node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx && node->ctx->crypto->decrypt) {
>  	if (node->nchildren != 2) {
>  	    /* this violates RFC 3156 section 4, so we won't bother with it. */
>  	    fprintf (stderr, "Error: %d part(s) for a multipart/encrypted "
> @@ -203,10 +197,10 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
>  #ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
>  	    GMimeDecryptResult *decrypt_result = NULL;
>  	    node->decrypted_child = g_mime_multipart_encrypted_decrypt
> -		(encrypteddata, node->ctx->cryptoctx, &decrypt_result, &err);
> +		(encrypteddata, node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx, &decrypt_result, &err);
>  #else
>  	    node->decrypted_child = g_mime_multipart_encrypted_decrypt
> -		(encrypteddata, node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
> +		(encrypteddata, node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx, &err);
>  #endif
>  	    if (node->decrypted_child) {
>  		node->decrypt_success = node->verify_attempted = TRUE;
> @@ -224,7 +218,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
>  			 (err ? err->message : "no error explanation given"));
>  	    }
>  	}
> -    } else if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part) && node->ctx->cryptoctx) {
> +    } else if (GMIME_IS_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part) && node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx) {
>  	if (node->nchildren != 2) {
>  	    /* this violates RFC 3156 section 5, so we won't bother with it. */
>  	    fprintf (stderr, "Error: %d part(s) for a multipart/signed message "
> @@ -233,7 +227,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
>  	} else {
>  #ifdef GMIME_ATLEAST_26
>  	    node->sig_list = g_mime_multipart_signed_verify
> -		(GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
> +		(GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto->gpgctx, &err);
>  	    node->verify_attempted = TRUE;
>  
>  	    if (!node->sig_list)
> @@ -249,7 +243,7 @@ _mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part)
>  	     * In GMime 2.6, they're both non-const, so we'll be able
>  	     * to clean up this asymmetry. */
>  	    GMimeSignatureValidity *sig_validity = g_mime_multipart_signed_verify
> -		(GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->cryptoctx, &err);
> +		(GMIME_MULTIPART_SIGNED (part), node->ctx->crypto.gpgctx, &err);

This should be crypto->gpgctx.

>  	    node->verify_attempted = TRUE;
>  	    node->sig_validity = sig_validity;
>  	    if (sig_validity) {