* Re: Message deletion wisdom
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
@ 2012-04-04 7:38 ` Jani Nikula
2012-04-05 16:24 ` Antoine Beaupré
2012-04-05 16:20 ` Antoine Beaupré
2012-04-08 22:24 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2012-04-04 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Jacek Generowicz, notmuch
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:32:04 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03 2012, Jacek Generowicz <jacek.generowicz@cern.ch> wrote:
> > Looking through the archives of this list, I see that the topic of
> > message deletion is, if not controversial, then at least non-trivial.
> >
> > + Requests for the provision of message deletion mechanisms have
> > appeared many times, and that various patches addressing the issue
> > have been submitted, and (IIUC) some of these are awaiting review
> > and might possibly make it into an official release in the future.
> >
> > + Having the 'deleted' tag cause messages to be deleted is,
> > apparently, fraught with peril of losing mail.
>
> Hi, Jacek. You are right on both of these points. It has indeed been a
> controversial topic. However, I would say that we have reached a stasis
> in terms of our response to this issue. I'll try to summarize here.
>
> I can say with a very high degree of certainly that notmuch will NEVER
> gain the capability to actually delete mail files from disk itself. It
> is too risky for notmuch to be involved in that, and it's too easy to do
> it outside of notmuch (e.g. "notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted |
> xargs rm"). This has never really been up for discussion.
To amend that (with mostly historical and not so helpful info), notmuch
used to have the ability to sync the "deleted" tag with the T
("trashed") maildir flag (with maildir.synchronize_flags option
set). Other mail clients or offlineimap were then able to delete the
mails locally and/or on a server. However, this too had some issues
(concerning multiple files with the same message-id) making it
potentially dangerous, and was removed [1]. Whether this feature ever
makes a comeback depends on someone tackling the problems. And taking
into account the fact that current users of the deleted tag probably do
not expect the files to be actually deleted.
[1] http://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch/commit/2c262042ac174d7bc96d6035ab9c88bd0abe7f35
BR,
Jani.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Message deletion wisdom
2012-04-04 7:38 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2012-04-05 16:24 ` Antoine Beaupré
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Beaupré @ 2012-04-05 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, Jameson Graef Rollins, Jacek Generowicz, notmuch
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1670 bytes --]
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 07:38:37 +0000, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:
> To amend that (with mostly historical and not so helpful info), notmuch
> used to have the ability to sync the "deleted" tag with the T
> ("trashed") maildir flag (with maildir.synchronize_flags option
> set). Other mail clients or offlineimap were then able to delete the
> mails locally and/or on a server. However, this too had some issues
> (concerning multiple files with the same message-id) making it
> potentially dangerous, and was removed [1]. Whether this feature ever
> makes a comeback depends on someone tackling the problems. And taking
> into account the fact that current users of the deleted tag probably do
> not expect the files to be actually deleted.
I rolled patches for this in the past, see the following message:
id:"1310874973-28437-1-git-send-email-anarcat@koumbit.org"
id:"1310874973-28437-2-git-send-email-anarcat@koumbit.org"
They were indeed refused by the community, but I felt they were still
useful.
I do not use those patches nowadays, however, but to me they would fit
in a broader architectural view of notmuch, where tags are not only
metadata sitting outside of your email, but is also written to the
messages themselves.
The idea is that you can then run notmuch from multiple places without
having to worry about synchronising your tags manually: the tags would
sit in the messages themselves.
A.
--
Ce que les siècles des grands abatoirs nous aura appris
Devrait être inscrit au fond de toutes les écoles;
Voici l'homme: le destructeur des mondes est arrivé.
- [no one is innocent]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Message deletion wisdom
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2012-04-04 7:38 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2012-04-05 16:20 ` Antoine Beaupré
2012-04-06 20:17 ` Mark Anderson
2012-04-08 22:24 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Beaupré @ 2012-04-05 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Jacek Generowicz, notmuch
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1533 bytes --]
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:32:04 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> So in summary, if you would like to "delete" messages, you can:
>
> * add a key binding to emacs (or your favorite ui) to add a "deleted"
> tag to messages that you want to delete:
>
> (define-key notmuch-show-mode-map "d"
> (lambda ()
> (interactive)
> (notmuch-show-tag-message "+deleted")))
Thank you for this. I had tried to reroll your patches
(id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net") on
top of 0.12 and that was a miserable failure, so the above works
well. In fact, I have made it like this instead:
(define-key notmuch-show-mode-map "d"
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(notmuch-show-tag-message "+deleted")
(notmuch-show-next-open-message)))
... but it doesn't seem to actually go to the next message... oh well,
at least I can delete mail.
Also note that you can delete whole threads with this:
(define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(notmuch-search-tag-thread "+deleted")
(notmuch-search-next-thread)))
... and I have added an undelete function:
(define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "u"
(lambda ()
(interactive)
(notmuch-search-tag-thread "-deleted")
(notmuch-search-next-thread)))
> * and if you really want them purged from disk, delete them manually
> with:
>
> notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted | xargs -l rm
I use this script:
[-- Attachment #1.2: notmuch-purge --]
[-- Type: application/x-sh, Size: 220 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #1.3: Type: text/plain, Size: 613 bytes --]
Finally, I want to voice that I feel a "delete" key, even if it doesn't
delete mails, seems like an important part of a mail user
agent. Archiving mail is one thing, but for the love and respect of
sysadmins and the infrastructure they maintain, please consider adding
at least a way to *tag* those deleted emails.
Having the above keys being defined as standard in notmuch don't seem
like much to ask.
This may be a dissenting view here, but your mail is not that
important. :P
Cheers,
A.
--
L'art n'est pas un bureau d'anthropométrie.
- Léo Ferré, "Préface"
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Message deletion wisdom
2012-04-05 16:20 ` Antoine Beaupré
@ 2012-04-06 20:17 ` Mark Anderson
2012-04-09 21:36 ` green
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Anderson @ 2012-04-06 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Antoine Beaupré, Jameson Graef Rollins, Jacek Generowicz,
notmuch
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:20:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> wrote:
> Finally, I want to voice that I feel a "delete" key, even if it doesn't
> delete mails, seems like an important part of a mail user
> agent. Archiving mail is one thing, but for the love and respect of
> sysadmins and the infrastructure they maintain, please consider adding
> at least a way to *tag* those deleted emails.
>
> Having the above keys being defined as standard in notmuch don't seem
> like much to ask.
>
> This may be a dissenting view here, but your mail is not that
> important. :P
Hear! Hear!
I also would like to have some natural way to mark things as "I never
expect to look at this again". Do I really need to keep track of every
vacation and calendar notice? Or every logfile I have my infrastructure
email to me, that doesn't really need to be in email, but was easily
shoehorned into the existing notification/logging side effects of mail?
My infrastructure is building new models for unit-level testing daily, I
don't need to keep track of every model for years, and I have been using
notmuch for years. Hmm, December 2009, it has been a while. :)
I do set up a deleted tag for my own use, but it would be nice if that
were viewed as a little more natural use case by the software from the
./configure script. Yes Virginia, notmuch comes with NotMuch of a box.
Thanks,
-Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Message deletion wisdom
2012-04-06 20:17 ` Mark Anderson
@ 2012-04-09 21:36 ` green
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: green @ 2012-04-09 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: notmuch
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1385 bytes --]
Mark Anderson wrote at 2012-04-06 15:17 -0500:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:20:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> wrote:
> > Finally, I want to voice that I feel a "delete" key, even if it doesn't
> > delete mails, seems like an important part of a mail user
> > agent. Archiving mail is one thing, but for the love and respect of
> > sysadmins and the infrastructure they maintain, please consider adding
> > at least a way to *tag* those deleted emails.
> >
> > Having the above keys being defined as standard in notmuch don't seem
> > like much to ask.
> >
> > This may be a dissenting view here, but your mail is not that
> > important. :P
>
> Hear! Hear!
I agree also. I receive lots of mail that I never want to see again, nor do
I want to see it still existing anywhere in my /home/user or in my backups.
Someone might argue "but what if you decide you want it later" but I can use
an Expires header to mark a message like "delete in 2 months", so I still
have a chance to retrieve it within an amount of time I choose.
Somewhat related is the concept of saving spam messages. I can understand
the reasoning behind training bayesian filters, but I have never kept spam.
I switched to bogofilter recently, and it was correctly filtering mail very
quickly, perhaps within a few weeks (I did train it using non-spam messages).
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Message deletion wisdom
2012-04-03 23:32 ` Jameson Graef Rollins
2012-04-04 7:38 ` Jani Nikula
2012-04-05 16:20 ` Antoine Beaupré
@ 2012-04-08 22:24 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Spaeth @ 2012-04-08 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jameson Graef Rollins, Jacek Generowicz, notmuch
Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
>So in summary, if you would like to "delete" messages, you can:
>
> * add a key binding to emacs (or your favorite ui) to add a "deleted"
> tag to messages that you want to delete:
>
> (define-key notmuch-show-mode-map "d"
> (lambda ()
> (interactive)
> (notmuch-show-tag-message "+deleted")))
>
> * add exclusion for messages with the "deleted" tag:
>
> notmuch config set search.exclude_tags deleted
>
> * and if you really want them purged from disk, delete them manually
> with:
>
> notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted | xargs -l rm
Thanks Jamie, that ws a very helpful summary.
Sebastian
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread