From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177D431FBC for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:15:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V+80W-+GvLQb for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D15C431FAE for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by ggni4 with SMTP id i4so3785753ggn.26 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of novalazy@gmail.com designates 10.236.155.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.155.101; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of novalazy@gmail.com designates 10.236.155.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=novalazy@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=novalazy@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.155.101]) by 10.236.155.101 with SMTP id i65mr38410276yhk.52.1331075729765 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DCZxjSQ57QtNvJc47QMwRGadHQKG4vAISb1Q7OkLTmw=; b=VsgpuwjmwJOQlvJNGOg4bAJjcAH5o956KT7KRhcjKkKFyieIylnuKTa/rJybr6xQND Ih3CcADqqRIjT3alg8UacEUGd63zaM1s5SJ3LMzL7uYfcFB367IPQgUSnar+4EGRSSJw YvpukTs/ISy4YZmX5nNv1XToC604sTF2FxVpUG0Hjnnojm5ZYwS1GgfeRAHSjW3+I5Lg FJqmyI7kktqYMLV6jPidVSd87OebPKz9JsbFyycZB5V4h5Yb4dGs3NWnSQDJDmt9YCOk hS2HwUwlrXqK60AgFv2egsRaeIcXb8RgpsysfrFwxfQjaZflEcpBClIjqM7w9gIihyXk GYtw== Received: by 10.236.155.101 with SMTP id i65mr30477682yhk.52.1331075729623; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm33169126anc.3.2012.03.06.15.15.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:16:16 +1100 Message-ID: <20120307101616.GA2635@hili.localdomain> From: Peter Wang To: Patrick Totzke Subject: Re: [alot] reply from search mode In-Reply-To: <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> References: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com> <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:15:32 -0000 On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:17:47 +0000, Patrick Totzke wrote: > Quoting Philippe LeCavalier (2012-03-06 16:00:16) > >How would I add a reply key binding to reply directly from the search > >mode. ie something like R. Forward and editnew would be nice as well. > > This could indeed be useful, but I'm not convinced this is a great idea in general: > What would that command do if your selection is a thread with multiple leaf-mails? > reply to the first? ask the user? I have yet to implement this in bower, but my idea is to reply to the only message in the thread with the "unread" tag. Abort if there is more than one such message. Peter