From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE97431FBC for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:17:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nfTyt-nQpGl6 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BE3431FAE for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by wico1 with SMTP id o1so2860323wic.26 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:17:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:user-agent :to:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:date; bh=eCx2NkzRo3Tnd80Vg2RT6qzii+nbAxoby5jh9bp00/4=; b=HJMjEPAByKB+GdPnFiRYWNMq/Yuz8/F2v2esNcRhSO9vDKmay+Mhz6Ce0VCLX9s/UA CCV357cSLc6rgPjIm0PKAeLXedzrPWFA+glGcDh76zLWqpbKvBTLBolaCfhLVKIGjaZb XjfKY8k9p/Zg+9O3duQgYhZkv2QRVcSCpjIu8TMZ9py2flcgd1/34OPhqBL9she55B65 b34SB7oXU3BCRw1VXVc7t1FghRel2rva7Rgj3B7hfpMEYKqaLbUVleD9lU9AaG3nDt9o CuoGIdzTujn7+h7lARfyf3dM4UNpSdGbFBXjFTxIfXprEhIPXhOIINY0VFXbuq87v/Ux Y79w== Received: by 10.180.86.230 with SMTP id s6mr21697878wiz.16.1331068669989; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc1-sgyl2-0-0-cust548.18-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.41.10.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm31028527wiw.9.2012.03.06.13.17.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:17:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Patrick Totzke User-Agent: alot/0.21+ To: Philippe LeCavalier , notmuch@notmuchmail.org References: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com> In-Reply-To: <20120306160016.2673.36080@plc.plecavalier.com> Message-ID: <20120306211747.31898.21772@brick.lan> Subject: Re: [alot] reply from search mode Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:17:47 +0000 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:17:53 -0000 Quoting Philippe LeCavalier (2012-03-06 16:00:16) >How would I add a reply key binding to reply directly from the search >mode. ie something like R. Forward and editnew would be nice as well. This could indeed be useful, but I'm not convinced this is a great idea in = general: What would that command do if your selection is a thread with multiple leaf= -mails? reply to the first? ask the user? cheers, /p