From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780C6431FAF for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ewk8d9lML0SP for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.12]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF14A431FAE for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:18:09 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7fad6d000000920-cf-4f21d11ea941 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 27.8A.02336.E11D12F4; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:18:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q0QMI6Aj023473; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:18:06 -0500 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q0QMI4rC019847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:18:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RqXdG-0002Vt-4o; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:17:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:17:26 -0500 From: Austin Clements To: Jeremy Nickurak Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: add default value to notmuch-search-line-faces Message-ID: <20120126221726.GH1940@mit.edu> References: <1327605679-15213-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <20120126194146.GG1940@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0ZW7qOhv8KDNyqJpurPF7z37WCyu 35zJ7MDscev+a3aPZ6tuMXtsXPuSKYA5issmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvjxZzfrAUn2Srm/kttYJzD 2sXIySEhYCIxbWI3G4QtJnHh3nogm4tDSGAfo8SZZZfZIZwNjBIdmy8zQTgnmSR2n+hlgXCW MEpsXnwebBaLgKrE0dX7GUFsNgENiW37l4PZIgJ6Eovu7gPbwSxgJdGw5QNYXFjAS+LniZ8s IDavgLbEmfPvmCGGrmCU+LD7AxtEQlDi5MwnLBDNWhI3/r0EOoMDyJaWWP6PAyTMKRAo0bv7 GzOILSqgIjHl5Da2CYxCs5B0z0LSPQuhewEj8ypG2ZTcKt3cxMyc4tRk3eLkxLy81CJdQ73c zBK91JTSTYygUOeU5NnB+Oag0iFGAQ5GJR5er0mK/kKsiWXFlbmHGCU5mJREedvPA4X4kvJT KjMSizPii0pzUosPMUpwMCuJ8N7xAsrxpiRWVqUW5cOkpDlYlMR5VbTe+QkJpCeWpGanphak FsFkZTg4lCR4J14AahQsSk1PrUjLzClBSDNxcIIM5wEa3gBSw1tckJhbnJkOkT/FqCglzlsH khAASWSU5sH1wlLRK0ZxoFeEIVbwANMYXPcroMFMQIPLz4MNLklESEk1MG4/sP5Hesazsp98 vZxq4oss9yqeMOlo9CuPDalUKG+8tXl5xJTF55cYXf7HeWnrh8jFUluvtzB16PX/6rgcM3W7 9eHXrTmT2jwcjW721wbIWXsf2ZUkM1Oqb/ueW5K3NvkoW/lt23Wt2zLysKCwcW+PTfrCgN29 B++FSq671MbbX69ozrVVWImlOCPRUIu5qDgRAItkD58gAwAA Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:18:10 -0000 Quoth Jeremy Nickurak on Jan 26 at 2:59 pm: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:41, Austin Clements wrote: > > As much as I would like this, many terminals don't visually > > distinguish between the default face and the default face in bold. > > I've taken a shot at this under xterm, gnome-terminal, and a basic > linux VT. I figure that if something is broken in another terminal > that breaks in one of these, it's somebody-elses-problem :) > > Xterm/gnome-terminal support bold just fine. With a Linux VT, emacs > just chooses i slightly lighter color, which is totally usable. Cool. If this works in those, then I'm happy with the bold. (Upon further inspection, it's possible that I'm just full of it and the font I've been using for the past decade or so is simply too small to have a bold variant.)