From: Ruben <meskio@sindominio.net>
To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Additional maildir-sync test
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:41:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101122104153.GA2983@blackspot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mxp3k0ur.fsf@wsheee.2x.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1379 bytes --]
On 00:54, Sun 21 Nov 10, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > your patch fixes the problem, but it also breaks one of the tests in
> > test suite. I created the test for your patch ...
>
> and here is another test which was in my original synchronization
> patches, but Carl decided to remove it. It checks that tagging message
> by an unrelated tag does not move the message from new to cur. This test
> currently fails.
>
> In id:"20100323143714.GE28596@blackspot" Ruben wrote that for some mail
> readers there is a difference between mails in new and mails without "S"
> flag in cur.
>
> Ruben, is the current behavior problematic for you?
It's not a problem for me. For mutt (which I use often) to have it on 'new' or
'cur' don't makes any difference, if the 'S' flag is not there I see them as
'unread'. Actually in mutt if you read an email and later flags it as 'unread'
it moves the email 'cur' and puts the ':2,' without the 'S' flag.
For me is the same to have the email at 'new' or at 'cur', the only thing I
wanted is to have support to fetchmail new emails.
--
Rubén Pollán | jabber:meskio@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Lo hago para no volverme loco cuando noto
que solo me queda un demonio en un hombro
por que se ha cortado las venas
el ángel que había en el otro.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 13:04 Maildir-flags synchronization now on master branch Carl Worth
2010-11-11 14:11 ` Kristoffer Ström
2010-11-11 22:38 ` Carl Worth
2010-11-12 0:43 ` Carl Worth
2010-11-12 1:43 ` Dirk Hohndel
2010-11-18 15:37 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-11-19 15:41 ` [PATCH] Including 'unread' tag to mails without maildir flags meskio
2010-11-20 23:26 ` Michal Sojka
2010-11-20 23:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] test: Add test for messages without maildir info in new Michal Sojka
2010-11-20 23:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] Include 'unread' tag only to mails " Michal Sojka
2010-11-22 10:43 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-11-20 23:54 ` [PATCH] Additional maildir-sync test Michal Sojka
2010-11-22 10:41 ` Ruben [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101122104153.GA2983@blackspot \
--to=meskio@sindominio.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
--cc=sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).