On 09:36, Tue 09 Mar 10, Carl Worth wrote:
> So the final proposal for iteration in either direction is:
> 
> 	move_to_first
>         valid
>         move_to_next
> 
> 	move_to_last
>         valid
>         move_to_previous
> 
>         get

Fine for me.

> I've just pushed commits changing the existing functions (which allow
> only forward iteration) to use this naming scheme. I haven't added any
> of the reverse-iteration functions yet, so Ruben, if you'd like to do
> those within this scheme, that would be find. (Or we could wait until we
> have an actual use in mind for them.)

I'll implemented them again and we'll decide if make sense to have them even if
there is no code now using them. I think is a useful feature to create a client
based on notmuch library, but I also think is bad behavior to keep code that is 
not in use.

I'm still thinking in a ncurses client (but I didn't hack on that on a while)
and I guess I'll use this functions on it. But I don't mind to have them just in
my own repository until I have something working.

I'm not having too much hacking time lately, so I don't know when I'll have
some time for it. I hope in few days.


-- 
Rubén Pollán  | jabber:meskio@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Cuando los que mandan pierden la vergüenza,
    los que obedecen pierden el respeto.