unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Mail in git
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:21:01 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100217012101.GD8249@lapse.rw.madduck.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100215002914.GA22402@flamingspork.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2006 bytes --]

also sprach Stewart Smith <stewart@flamingspork.com> [2010.02.15.1329 +1300]:
> What about adding more mail to the archive?
> 
> So the way I think is that you use a Maildir for day to day mail
> (e.g. delivery) and every so often you run some magic command that
> takes old mail out of the Maildir and stores it in the git repo.

Either that, or the other idea we had (which I prefer), which would
basically be:

  evenless-submit — add a new mail (and return a hash ID)
                    and invoke a hook, e.g. to let notmuch know
  evenless-cat    — print the full mail given ID with headers to stdout
  evenless-delete — unlink a mail identified by hash ID
                    and invoke a hook, e.g. to let notmuch know

If we expose the submit and delete functionality at the notmuch
level, then we don't need the hooks for then evenless would be
plumbing.

Anything to avoid a cronjob would be good, I think.

Then we need a notmuch backend for mutt etc.. For those who still
want to use a regular Maildir, let them use the worktree.

What I am wondering is if (explicit) tags couldn't be represented as
tree-objects with this.

  evenless-link   — link a message object with a tree object
  evenless–unlink – unlink a message object from tree object
    [replaces evenless-unlink]

messages would then be deleted whenever using git-gc.

No idea how this would sync if we don't keep ancestry. Otoh, it
would probably not be very expensive to do just that.

notmuch would then only search and provide the hash ID(s); tags
would be a function of storage.

Is it possible to find out all trees that reference a given object
with Git in constant or sub-linear time?

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"the question of whether computers can think
 is like the question of whether submarines can swim."
                                                 -- edsgar w. dijkstra
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15  0:29 Mail in git Stewart Smith
2010-02-16  9:08 ` Michal Sojka
2010-02-16 19:06 ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-17  0:21   ` Stewart Smith
2010-02-17 10:07     ` Stewart Smith
2011-05-21  7:05       ` martin f krafft
2011-05-21  7:25         ` Stewart Smith
2010-02-17  1:21 ` martin f krafft [this message]
2010-02-17 15:03   ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-17 19:23     ` Mark Anderson
2010-02-17 19:34       ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-17 23:52         ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  0:39           ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-18  1:58             ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  2:19               ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-18  2:48                 ` nested tag trees (was: Mail in git) martin f krafft
2010-02-18  4:32                   ` martin f krafft
     [not found]                   ` <1266463007-sup-8777@ben-laptop>
2010-02-18  4:34                     ` martin f krafft
     [not found]                     ` <20100218034613.GD1991@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
2010-02-18  4:44                       ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-18  4:59                         ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  5:10                           ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-19  0:31                             ` martin f krafft
2010-02-19  9:52                               ` Michal Sojka
2010-02-19 14:27                                 ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-17 23:56   ` Mail in git Stewart Smith
2010-02-18  1:01     ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-18  2:00       ` martin f krafft
2010-02-18  2:11         ` Git ancestry and sync problems (was: Mail in git) martin f krafft
2010-02-18  8:34           ` racin
2010-02-18 12:20             ` Jameson Rollins
2010-02-18 12:47             ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-18 23:23             ` martin f krafft

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100217012101.GD8249@lapse.rw.madduck.net \
    --to=madduck@madduck.net \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).