Re: Threading

[martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1349 bytes --]

also sprach Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> [2010.01.15.1108 +1300]:
> > Reading is one thing. Information storage and organisation is
> > another. After a message is delivered (and read) to my mailbox,
> > it's really mine and I can (and should be able) to affix it and
> > integrate it into my organisational scheme any way I want, don't
> > you think?
> 
> A fair point.
> 
> I don't see this being something I'm going to spend any time
> implementing. I just wouldn't use the functionality myself. But
> I would be happy to integrate patches if someone came up with
> some.

Maybe I should try to persuade you in person.

Just today I referenced a discussion I had with a client's ISP,
which was done via a web-based support system (custhelp.com). They
send you e-mail for every post you or they make to the thread, but
those e-mails do not reference each other. Fortunately, I stitched
them together and when I searched for the correspondence in my
mailstore, I had the entire thread available to me, which was handy
(thanks to mutt's useful thread handling abilities).

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"this week dragged past me so slowly;
 the days fell on their knees..."
                                                        -- david bowie
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]