From: Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added regress option to tags iterator
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:01:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091209220133.GA10685@blackspot> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hsv6hbo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1554 bytes --]
On 12:08, Wed 09 Dec 09, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net> wrote:
> > Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
>
> I don't love the name, (since it's so close to the word "regression"
> which has a totally different meaning in software context). But I also
> don't have an immediate suggestion for an improved name yet either.
Me neither, but as I don't have any better idea I just use regress. But we can
try to come up with something better.
>
> > What about the functions notmuch_*_is_first? Is kind of reversed logic than
> > notmuch_*_has_more, the last are true when is not reach the limit but the
> > first ones are true when the limit is reached. But I think it make sense like
> > that.
>
> I'd like a more symmetric API here. Anyone have a favorite set of names
> for iterating a list in two directions?
Yes, but actually are a bit different somehow. When you advance the last
iterator you can reach is a non-valid (outside the list) iterator. When you
'regress' the iterator at the end is a valid iterator, I don't see the need on
get outside of the list like with advance.
So, maybe because of it have sense the functions notmuch_*_is_first. Anyway I
really don't mind, one or other. To change it is trivial. It's harder to find a
good pair of names.
--
Rubén Pollán | jabber:meskio@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
La felicidad no es hacer lo que deseas
es desear lo que haces.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-09 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-26 20:23 notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back Ruben Pollan
2009-11-28 3:57 ` Carl Worth
2009-12-06 17:34 ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-07 17:23 ` Carl Worth
2009-12-08 9:41 ` regress option to messages iterator meskio
2009-12-08 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Convert notmuch_message_list_t in a doubly linked meskio
2009-12-08 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Added regress option to messages iterator meskio
2009-12-08 9:57 ` ruben pollan
2009-12-09 12:45 ` [PATCH] Added regress option to threads iterator Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 13:10 ` [PATCH] Added regress option to tags iterator Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 13:24 ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 20:08 ` Carl Worth
2009-12-09 21:21 ` Mark Anderson
2009-12-09 21:37 ` Carl Worth
2009-12-09 22:05 ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 22:01 ` Ruben Pollan [this message]
2009-12-22 1:23 ` Carl Worth
2009-12-22 3:16 ` Carl Worth
2010-01-05 15:33 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-01-05 19:39 ` Carl Worth
2010-01-06 9:08 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-03-09 17:36 ` Carl Worth
2010-03-11 14:28 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23 ` reverse iterators Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 20:07 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2010-03-22 10:18 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 21:32 ` [PATCH] sending again patches 3 & 4 Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 21:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move the logic of threads iterator out of 'valid' Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] Added backwards iterator to threads Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] Convert notmuch_message_list_t in a doubly linked Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] Added backwards iterator to messages Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] Move the logic of threads iterator out of 'valid' Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] Added backwards iterator to threads Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] Added backwards iterator to tags Ruben Pollan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091209220133.GA10685@blackspot \
--to=meskio@sindominio.net \
--cc=cworth@cworth.org \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).