From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4DC431FAE for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:22:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-wec9G3KWF3 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from sirius.lasnet.de (sirius.lasnet.de [78.47.116.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D65431FBC for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:22:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from p5b034af6.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.3.74.246] helo=excalibur) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1NBvXC-0002Il-0h by authid with cram_md5; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:22:17 +0100 Received: from stefan by excalibur with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NBvXB-0006lM-I9; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:22:13 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:22:13 +0100 From: Stefan Schmidt To: Carl Worth Message-ID: <20091121192213.GB24602@excalibur.local> References: <20091121145111.GB19397@excalibur.local> <1258816372.8741.15.camel@rover> <87einr4x3i.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87einr4x3i.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:22:21 -0000 Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:16, Carl Worth wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:12:52 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > I haven't figured out how to quickly tag everything as already read or > > archived or whatever .. can someone who knows more about what's going on > > confirm my hypothesis and if so, suggest the best approach to getting to > > a happier state? > > See my message up-thread. The only reasonable ways all really do involve > at least a little bit of C-code hacking to either prevent those tags > from getting put there by "notmuch new" or to make it easier to get them > off afterwards. Let's see if I come up with something here. > And I can't help but apologize. I've known about all these issues, and > wouldn't have invited people to try things out in the current state. But > it was nice of Keith to share this with everyone. And it's nice of all > you to come take a look at things. Getting it out now was a good move. It had enough code to actually do omething usefull and many people waited for something like this. The increasing number of contributors in such a short time shows it very well. :) regards Stefan Schmidt