From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F38431FB6 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:23:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2hzss5zaQRR for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCE32431FAE for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 10:23:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142167090129.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.167.90.129] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TkIsH-0007mp-QF for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:23:42 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TkIsC-0003cE-BL for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:23:36 -0400 From: david@tethera.net To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: memory leak tests Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:23:24 -0400 Message-Id: <1355682208-13729-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:23:44 -0000 These are slightly rough around the edges, but I think they are useful. They already helped me track down a memory leak in notmuch new (id:1355234087-6886-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net, id:1355196820-29734-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net) They also would have caught the restore leak Jani pointed out in parse_sup_line, although that is a bit of hindsight since I didn't write the obvious test until Jani pointed out the leak.