[PATCH v7.1 09/11] test: Add broken tests for new emacs reply functionality

[Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>]

Add tests for creating nice replies to multipart messages, including
those with HTML parts. These tests are expected to fail for now.
---
 test/emacs |   97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/emacs b/test/emacs
index 29a489c..01afdb6 100755
--- a/test/emacs
+++ b/test/emacs
@@ -273,6 +273,103 @@ On 01 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -0000, Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org> w
 EOF
 test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
 
+test_begin_subtest "Reply within emacs to a multipart/mixed message"
+test_subtest_known_broken
+test_emacs '(notmuch-show "id:20091118002059.067214ed@hikari")
+		(notmuch-show-reply)
+		(test-output)'
+cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
+From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org>
+To: Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] Introducing myself
+In-Reply-To: <20091118002059.067214ed@hikari>
+Fcc: ${MAIL_DIR}/sent
+--text follows this line--
+Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com> writes:
+
+> Hello to all,
+>
+> I have just heard about Not Much today in some random Linux-related news
+> site (LWN?), my name is Adrian Perez and I work as systems administrator
+> (although I can do some code as well :P). I have always thought that the
+> ideas behind Sup were great, but after some time using it, I got tired of
+> the oddities that it has. I also do not like doing things like having to
+> install Ruby just for reading and sorting mails. Some time ago I thought
+> about doing something like Not Much and in fact I played a bit with the
+> Python+Xapian and the Python+Whoosh combinations, because I find relaxing
+> to code things in Python when I am not working and also it is installed
+> by default on most distribution. I got to have some mailboxes indexed and
+> basic searching working a couple of months ago. Lately I have been very
+> busy and had no time for coding, and them... boom! Not Much appears -- and
+> it is almost exactly what I was trying to do, but faster. I have been
+> playing a bit with Not Much today, and I think it has potential.
+>
+> Also, I would like to share one idea I had in mind, that you might find
+> interesting: One thing I have found very annoying is having to re-tag my
+> mail when the indexes get b0rked (it happened a couple of times to me while
+> using Sup), so I was planning to mails as read/unread and adding the tags
+> not just to the index, but to the mail text itself, e.g. by adding a
+> "X-Tags" header field or by reusing the "Keywords" one. This way, the index
+> could be totally recreated by re-reading the mail directories, and this
+> would also allow to a tools like OfflineIMAP [1] to get the mails into a
+> local maildir, tagging and indexing the mails with the e-mail reader and
+> then syncing back the messages with the "X-Tags" header to the IMAP server.
+> This would allow to use the mail reader from a different computer and still
+> have everything tagged finely.
+>
+> Best regards,
+>
+>
+> ---
+> [1] http://software.complete.org/software/projects/show/offlineimap
+>
+> -- 
+> Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>
+> Igalia - Free Software Engineering
+> _______________________________________________
+> notmuch mailing list
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+EOF
+test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
+
+test_begin_subtest "Reply within emacs to a multipart/alternative message"
+test_subtest_known_broken
+test_emacs '(notmuch-show "id:cf0c4d610911171136h1713aa59w9cf9aa31f052ad0a@mail.gmail.com")
+		(notmuch-show-reply)
+		(test-output)'
+cat <<EOF >EXPECTED
+From: Notmuch Test Suite <test_suite@notmuchmail.org>
+To: Alex Botero-Lowry <alex.boterolowry@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+Subject: Re: [notmuch] preliminary FreeBSD support
+In-Reply-To: <cf0c4d610911171136h1713aa59w9cf9aa31f052ad0a@mail.gmail.com>
+Fcc: ${MAIL_DIR}/sent
+--text follows this line--
+Alex Botero-Lowry <alex.boterolowry@gmail.com> writes:
+
+> I saw the announcement this morning, and was very excited, as I had been
+> hoping sup would be turned into a library,
+> since I like the concept more than the UI (I'd rather an emacs interface).
+>
+> I did a preliminary compile which worked out fine, but
+> sysconf(_SC_SC_GETPW_R_SIZE_MAX) returns -1 on
+> FreeBSD, so notmuch_config_open segfaulted.
+>
+> Attached is a patch that supplies a default buffer size of 64 in cases where
+> -1 is returned.
+>
+> http://www.opengroup.org/austin/docs/austin_328.txt - seems to indicate this
+> is acceptable behavior,
+> and http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bugs/2006/06/07/msg016808.htmlspecifically
+> uses 64 as the
+> buffer size.
+> _______________________________________________
+> notmuch mailing list
+> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
+> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+EOF
+test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED
+
 test_begin_subtest "Quote MML tags in reply"
 message_id='test-emacs-mml-quoting@message.id'
 add_message [id]="$message_id" \
-- 
1.7.5.4