unofficial mirror of notmuch@notmuchmail.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Mark Anderson <markr.anderson@amd.com>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added regress option to tags iterator
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:21:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1260392368-sup-9167@testarossa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hsv6hbo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>

Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Wed Dec 09 13:08:43 -0700 2009:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net> wrote:
> > Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?
> 
> I don't love the name, (since it's so close to the word "regression"
> which has a totally different meaning in software context). But I also
> don't have an immediate suggestion for an improved name yet either.
> 
> > What about the functions notmuch_*_is_first? Is kind of reversed logic than
> > notmuch_*_has_more, the last are true when is not reach the limit but the
> > first ones are true when the limit is reached. But I think it make sense like
> > that.
> 
> I'd like a more symmetric API here. Anyone have a favorite set of names
> for iterating a list in two directions?

I like vocabulary games:

fwd/bck
forward/reverse
next/prev
advance/retreat
inc/dec
iter_fwd/iter_back
earlier/later
younger/older

I think that changing has_more is going to be a requirement to come up with a consistent set of names.

> 
> -Carl

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-09 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-26 20:23 notmuch_threads_back and notmuch_messages_back Ruben Pollan
2009-11-28  3:57 ` Carl Worth
2009-12-06 17:34   ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-07 17:23     ` Carl Worth
2009-12-08  9:41 ` regress option to messages iterator meskio
2009-12-08  9:41   ` [PATCH 1/2] Convert notmuch_message_list_t in a doubly linked meskio
2009-12-08  9:41     ` [PATCH 2/2] Added regress option to messages iterator meskio
2009-12-08  9:57   ` ruben pollan
2009-12-09 12:45 ` [PATCH] Added regress option to threads iterator Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 13:10 ` [PATCH] Added regress option to tags iterator Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 13:24   ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 20:08     ` Carl Worth
2009-12-09 21:21       ` Mark Anderson [this message]
2009-12-09 21:37         ` Carl Worth
2009-12-09 22:05         ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-09 22:01       ` Ruben Pollan
2009-12-22  1:23       ` Carl Worth
2009-12-22  3:16         ` Carl Worth
2010-01-05 15:33           ` Ruben Pollan
2010-01-05 19:39             ` Carl Worth
2010-01-06  9:08               ` Ruben Pollan
2010-03-09 17:36           ` Carl Worth
2010-03-11 14:28             ` Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23             ` reverse iterators Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 20:07               ` Sebastian Spaeth
2010-03-22 10:18                 ` Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 21:32               ` [PATCH] sending again patches 3 & 4 Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 21:32               ` [PATCH 1/2] Move the logic of threads iterator out of 'valid' Ruben Pollan
2010-03-21 21:32               ` [PATCH 2/2] Added backwards iterator to threads Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23             ` [PATCH 1/5] Convert notmuch_message_list_t in a doubly linked Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23             ` [PATCH 2/5] Added backwards iterator to messages Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23             ` [PATCH 3/5] Move the logic of threads iterator out of 'valid' Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23             ` [PATCH 4/5] Added backwards iterator to threads Ruben Pollan
2010-03-20 10:23             ` [PATCH 5/5] Added backwards iterator to tags Ruben Pollan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://notmuchmail.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1260392368-sup-9167@testarossa \
    --to=markr.anderson@amd.com \
    --cc=cworth@cworth.org \
    --cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).