From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFAA6DE00DD for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 08:53:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOwM8M1Co56B for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 08:53:38 -0800 (PST) X-Greylist: delayed 418 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at arlo; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 08:53:38 PST Received: from smtpout01-ext3.partage.renater.fr (smtpout01-ext3.partage.renater.fr [194.254.240.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F086DE00D3 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 08:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr (zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr [194.254.240.30]) by smtpout10.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE5861A48; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:46:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 888C61A004A; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:46:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4821A01CF; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:46:35 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr Received: from zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id uh91syLeszto; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:46:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from zstore-b3-014.partage.renater.fr (zstore-b3-014.partage.renater.fr [10.254.240.146]) by zmtaout01.partage.renater.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668581A004A; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:46:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 17:46:34 +0100 (CET) From: Tom Hirschowitz To: David Bremner Cc: Notmuch Mail Message-ID: <1241620023.1473473.1583513194981.JavaMail.zimbra@univ-smb.fr> In-Reply-To: <87blp9cwnx.fsf@tethera.net> References: <87ftelzrwp.fsf@hirscho.lama.univ-savoie.fr> <87blp9cwnx.fsf@tethera.net> Subject: Re: oldest-first MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [82.249.7.253] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.8_GA_3008 (ZimbraWebClient - FF68 (Linux)/8.8.8_GA_1703) Thread-Topic: oldest-first Thread-Index: hQB46EdQN0s3eJkE+VhwvG3Fj6+MYw== X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 16:53:40 -0000 Thanks for your answer. This is indeed not a bug then. It's not important, but my preferred sort order would be the opposite of newest-first. I prefer seeing older threads first, but often find myself missing recent messages in threads because they have older unread messages hence are considered old. Tom