From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC966DE0F6C for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 07:32:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2o9HTw-u7dFg for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 07:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from istari.evenmere.org (istari.evenmere.org [136.248.125.194]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F776DE0F66 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 07:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by istari.evenmere.org (Postfix, from userid 113) id 881A41E0067; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 10:32:45 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=evenmere.org; s=default; t=1551540765; bh=19jJcuKolTJehUPBkEwkEJzKTYH0fRVubFWC7UYXfvE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=iT6LBzOTex9SaasTmbkDycCiG5sFAfYXPK57iBGy9RC4yssaFpdoQmDFuz9q9oCYZ w+maVCiF5YK64WtmVGWt3krlTVu1kjKMtjBdtNrvUo7OXr0hTrA1qoE6rO3azgnS4G sGIDdnF/yFOCRN1fLgi/RglTia9DtU9ynZeYptwk= Received: from [192.168.0.20] (pool-108-7-216-63.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [108.7.216.63]) by istari.evenmere.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A4FF1E0067; Sat, 2 Mar 2019 10:32:43 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=evenmere.org; s=default; t=1551540763; bh=19jJcuKolTJehUPBkEwkEJzKTYH0fRVubFWC7UYXfvE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=vn2yqr+qjkTmizMtPFdHGU4dIp3OSGjuU2/lAhPWfZr3N4OhrLeztDVTOCtE1x0bE KdQPgD4kiyrfKaPMhPrj3w+rQIltYb4/L1BC1Odjmv/+KLi2pdhQ+XlneV7qcUaKU9 RAf/C0JcOxg1/zRZIsQurFNCuB/6eDperFihbP7M= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Reply to content of "List-Post" header? From: Brian Sniffen X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57) In-Reply-To: <87h8clcode.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 10:32:42 -0500 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0DE0AE6C-EE5E-4F19-88AD-6DE3BEE2F528@evenmere.org> References: <87imx2jknk.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> <87y35xpr1z.fsf@len.workgroup> <87h8clcode.fsf@ra.horus-it.com> To: Ralph Seichter X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 15:32:54 -0000 You can set message-subscribed-addresses or its cousins; then message-to-lis= t-only will work for you.=20 --=20 Brian Sniffen > On Mar 2, 2019, at 10:00 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote:= >=20 > * Gregor Zattler: >=20 >> I do "R" for reply-to-all and then C-c C-l for message-to-list-only >> which reduces the To: and Cc: to the mailing list address. >=20 > I tried both "C-c C-l" and "M-x message-to-list-only" on several > messages, but it does not seem to have any effect. I don't see any > error reports, but nothing happens. >=20 >> I don't know how this works, though. I assume it evaluates List- >> headers. >=20 > According to http://www.gnus.org/manual/big-message.html , Emacs Message > mode processes the "Mail-Followup-To" header, which seems to be a rarity > these days. "List-Post" et al apparently don't factor into it. >=20 > -Ralph > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch