From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS19151 64.147.108.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41051F59D for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 18:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="R35PAuTZ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A321478D4; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:25:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=qOXvBl1ktguQ tBENEIxglKhyomPaKCRJuYs3xXuRHnk=; b=R35PAuTZuAbrAJoWT48XnLVQ//8/ zXVfhOTNACLOktO8O8ujdzshgA/iAeN9jj320Wt2nVRxM13nwCki0QUTdrGrE/Bk MqJuT1zpszWxF3V2ipR2YEIpxrBVnBno+5YKvWrHdtw6xPqpoe6BRfowSqZF7EAE 2UI/I9D9+aYiTNA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678B31478D2; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:25:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5DC91478D1; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 14:25:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Eric Wong Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , git@vger.kernel.org, meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: `git patch-id --stable' vs quoted-printable References: <20220822022503.M873583@dcvr> <4e3edfa1-9c04-7a63-30ee-65fe6f2de62f@web.de> <20220822170114.M247768@dcvr> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:25:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20220822170114.M247768@dcvr> (Eric Wong's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:01:14 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C3053F40-2247-11ED-A497-5E84C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > I don't think postfix, SpamAssassin, or dovecot strip that.. > ... > I would expect the blank context lines in the QP version to have > "=3D20". I sent this to test@public-inbox.org using > `git send-email --transfer-encoding=3Dquoted-printable' and it > confirms the blank context lines having "=3D20" which are missing > in Ren=C3=A9's messages: > https://try.public-inbox.org/test/20220822165736.23246-1-e@80x24.org/ra= w Yeah, that is a mystery. Unlike format=3Dflawed, I think CTE-QP was designed to be reversible without information loss.