From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9742D1F4B4
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:29:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id 7so5105935qtp.1
        for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:29:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=/rb02T+jJffy7Ue3XdneHV9dR3BLXBqkI5kHgU1dVUI=;
        b=D2Y3dZjroTDqQwFvQkhZ5frAmgrva4xR8QGyK+g/mgas1GBECEp+cO/K/VKCt16oSw
         ijtaR8NspDbz+WosqvGFNkIDyXSlnl2geCAAPLUOBEl2QpVyEp8INBglnxQTGTjMlnHl
         tR13NaxOoaqxvv3N/F1IvnIkoa8DTjl3pQTFk=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=/rb02T+jJffy7Ue3XdneHV9dR3BLXBqkI5kHgU1dVUI=;
        b=VBsgeUyu4IpAFcC90/FqK6dphzyQklmI0v7NJDMB0/XL9APRqlIv/wPMAW6G6gWryi
         AJduKTnL0JV5UP/JSX1xtZsaDj/3K1Ja4/1yvXb8scgqthpWqbi4TsyDqE1PxnSqd7ru
         htyWFG/SCd81FavzOEVhhb7Ak1Q+uoQBEYtWLmJEfA3KbO+QLQnqqd/WSi9ZfUNqfIVX
         NjyTqQ2FLVcCu9PlWyc6Uhus6n/NTN6QGePvFcLQsPBH9kSqGd6WHDHaPFOUUYnc6jad
         sUAzrThWHQMhefoDU9wzmK8vQTwTVgTqNmfFNXaRgURXzLkCMs37Ga/tHvL9a31uRvwV
         nYQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339BWWrl8JXeACUZ19U1swYoPsbrrBa5VEn0vDnnuatdrx5/5v8
	CTi+Y/uHvlfET9/9FA3NhNLc5Or7F7BQxR9uAEJeUbsbRxcIN88u
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH2cwPfDXiPS6dty/Yj4+rNJUF4T9tI1Gw97evmIRqk9iOSCQZVH3LgfHvwyuCrTcATNHDUWHW0hp0FHqn6TI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5956:: with SMTP id 22mr11851326qtz.63.1607639368321;
 Thu, 10 Dec 2020 14:29:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201210202145.7agtcmrtl5jec42d@chatter.i7.local>
 <20201210205540.GA10371@dcvr> <20201210214329.do66z6gzvepxc5w3@chatter.i7.local>
In-Reply-To: <20201210214329.do66z6gzvepxc5w3@chatter.i7.local>
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:29:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMwyc-QjHdayCBw8eeawt4d-BbzjRQui8Z+pUwaYNA+1-Du+kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Extra newline when retrieving messages
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 16:43, Konstantin Ryabitsev
<konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is what causes DKIM verification to fail, and NOT the newline:

for the record, the DKIM RFC specifically deals with extra trailing newlines:

   The "simple" body canonicalization algorithm ignores all empty lines
   at the end of the message body.

(from https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6376#section-3.4.3)

I'll make it a point to double-check next time before jumping to conclusions. :)

-K