From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@t-8ch.de>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS24940 159.69.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 728FE1F852
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 20:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 21:48:22 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=t-8ch.de; s=mail;
	t=1642193302; bh=u7GvorJ0vwFmrxFortDQ4IwxViKgut6By82gamplDhc=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:From;
	b=iDpMm5RvGQUmeZ3SwthkayBNUWvOjrsR2dFG7HA052xqxdHKh5QztWhKIpGe4PfXX
	 a0onZr+fCJ6dmtO1mdyY4gYU5kORGvY0F5YpXwUJkJ0wTQepu/ye2vp0SFjIZSA2Of
	 IZckza2CGomg7SnMnFJnUmrcwKbGbIteolernbnw=
From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= <thomas@t-8ch.de>
To: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Windows-style linebreaks (\r\n) and the web-renderer
Message-ID: <8d13668f-cac7-4984-bb4e-ad90502dc46d@t-8ch.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Jabber-ID: thomas@t-8ch.de
X-Accept: text/plain, text/html;q=0.2, text/*;q=0.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en;q=0.8, de-de;q=0.7, de;q=0.6
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Hi,

it seems the rendering of \r\n (Windows-style) linebreaks, is a bit suboptimal
on the website.

The \r are rendered literally. Mutt for example does not.

Example: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210914093515.260031-1-maxime@cerno.tech/

Raw message:
    ...
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    ...


    Hi,=0D
    =0D
    ....

Rendered:

    ....
    Hi,\r
    \r
    ...


The fix is probably obvious for you, if not I can try to come up with one.

Thanks,
Thomas