From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out2.migadu.com (out2.migadu.com [188.165.223.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E23A1F9FC for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 01:54:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1; t=1616723691; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GtU+X/Y2rzTrZnp9m+daV7aiesJc7oWqHC1cwRrt+rA=; b=m/mWmEiU3DCL191TbVBCnHTcHgdTEMD3fijLE7tVY17RCEbFfclkHGc8mGY5LbbFfy1MiO zBiBWOwldFAj9iPvv4DIco2JTi/mN5IFmMlDH+0OpQRq50U3rqXA1eXTZKPkXTY3YWtXnb cwVsrXL4iyAksIse8kYlwRGA3TxgeT6WcXxgadvDCkoB6cPjbXZoH0n2UQgUSMpgeH7RQX V+flMpGeP4mp8l0MV6k5Au4z7lCVP13Oshr7ICVhcvA+vYLaJ8LB127J7JVh86hk0EyXK2 GRIUfLj7MF+CojzyKGtrlKjFWvagXEUIjHdkv1yxN8D9fU6mNwa6zCORpMMIig== From: Kyle Meyer To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: is "lei mark" a good name? In-Reply-To: <20210325052229.GA6447@dcvr> References: <20210325052229.GA6447@dcvr> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 21:54:44 -0400 Message-ID: <87tuoysmqj.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: kyle@kyleam.com List-Id: Eric Wong writes: > It can set/unset volatile metadata for any number of messages. > > "Volatile metadata" being "labels" (aka "mailboxes" in > JMAP-speak) and "keywords" (seen|flagged|answered|...), > (aka "flags" in IMAP/Maildir-speak). > > "lei mark +kw:seen" # makes sense > "lei mark +L:some-folder-name" # might sound odd... > > > AFAIK, notmuch uses "notmuch tag" which combines both labels > and keywords into one thing: "tags". But I'm also not a > notmuch user... (I am, though I still might be wrong.) Notmuch allows arbitrary tags to be associated with message IDs. It has some automatic tags like "attachment", "encrypted", and "signed" that it adds when indexing. By default, it also syncs some maildir flags to its tags (e.g., "F -> flagged", "R -> replied", "No S -> unread"). As far as I understand, tags are never connected up to the maildir folder/location, though Notmuch does support a separate "folder:..." search term. So, I guess in JMAP terms, Notmuch tags would be "mailboxes" (a subset of which are synced with maildir flags). > Would "lei tag" be better? Neither one really jumps out to me as better. "mark" sounds fine to me, and I don't find "tag" any more or less odd for the +L case above. > Anything else? Nothing comes to mind.