From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kyle@kyleam.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS11403 173.228.157.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016A71F619
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 16:19:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18449BD698;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:19:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to
	:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type; s=sasl; bh=O/vnG+soBbgfVcNNdbcUHazYHCQ=; b=assNs8
	ve1eo79IdDG62/ncOeBAU9auho+zLb8WNE+T7v4loKM8foz8PueaMu/DX84fVeNO
	frLR80m9qkc1Bh0RfflLlClVSLhSROmydx/a56xL3CIiJ3EVUqb2cnEsSXi8trEL
	sP/ckRYMRUwHKt32VlvW1vX/w88svJRk9tnDo=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110E9BD697;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:19:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com;
 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=XjJaFUBP46fnhm+wQE2zR+4HizKbIuwpBiRF8dP6Rxc=; b=LY8fFYTjFjp5MG9uTE1JTkE74XjkST3v+GioTzQ/hLWZpSVALu6I4Y4Xq4BNp23rFmX1gA6OhUjbJBkU8biBtV5NQIwsIe6C2Iqwjpvihq5CtYPMeNGxtbXwx+EnHON6QXxtfzW4/sqbppjxU4iR18ERugbbtFd1CXsEhaX0xro=
Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 881B6BD696;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2020 11:19:33 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com)
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
To: Eric Wong <e@yhbt.net>, meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: improve wording of "inbox" vs "repository"
In-Reply-To: <20200222082729.16551-1-e@yhbt.net>
References: <20200222082729.16551-1-e@yhbt.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 16:19:31 +0000
Message-ID: <87r1ym8ui4.fsf@kyleam.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Pobox-Relay-ID:
 1C8A5254-558F-11EA-8A76-8D86F504CC47-24757444!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Eric Wong <e@yhbt.net> writes:

> Since v2 inboxes contain multiple git repositories, avoid the
> use of the word "repository" when referring to inboxes as a
> whole in most places.
[...]
> diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
> index 94f690ef..70ea8eee 100644
> --- a/TODO
> +++ b/TODO
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ all need to be considered for everything we introduce)
>    https://public-inbox.org/meta/20160411034104.GA7817@dcvr.yhbt.net/
>    Perhaps make this depend solely the NNTP server and work as a proxy.
>    Meaning users can run this without needing a full copy of the
> -  archives in a git repository.
> +  archives in a git repositories.

I suppose it doesn't matter much in a TODO file, but you forgot to drop
an "a" here.

Oh, and public-inbox is a wonderful thing.  Thank you.