From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kyle@kyleam.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS202172 91.218.175.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from out-160.mta0.migadu.com (out-160.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.160])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9F61F5A0
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Sun,  5 Feb 2023 20:58:02 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kyleam.com header.i=@kyleam.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=LPTZnwuK;
	dkim-atps=neutral
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kyleam.com; s=key1;
	t=1675630679;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=ytGwFZY5hNnsLYKRho4OBKw/zsuQqjqwEte8PFYiMgM=;
	b=LPTZnwuKTKq21h0q2tyV5+225YKuxBbD2Ynl5PMYua+CNxmRFNa5OrT/prYKLmwAlaaVKB
	2r44+sNebZC0gQjlYuRFzCHy2ys+hjYb2lNJ1iKBqf0+QRavvoujVIxbwz0Dm6aekzlFF4
	raWyQD+ixzRLChCUJptZdlcyl64pDbQkyKzbmNIbgBiWREjDfqh5iMAZ1Z8lCDEL/R2Zbh
	FQ0YWaY2Iulvz+oWGG5wU09yBiPRlu1Al6qZ8C18BGSwkYE76Bqg3O+8HQOG9yY+4SzFE6
	VGsFVWXSqvNVutfgXmb6Lpi+vkNh5SLUmEMWG7nNb/p1+FU0BQkqiYr192bQ8Q==
From: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>, meta@public-inbox.org, Bastien
 Guerry <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] www: display Received: timestamp for dumped topics
In-Reply-To: <20230205202159.M111127@dcvr>
References: <87edr5gx63.fsf@kyleam.com> <20230204204110.M179231@dcvr>
 <87o7q7di5i.fsf@localhost> <87y1pb27r6.fsf@kyleam.com>
 <20230205202159.M111127@dcvr>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 15:57:57 -0500
Message-ID: <87r0v325ka.fsf@kyleam.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Eric Wong writes:

> I'm slightly against it.  Date: is what's shown in every other
> message view, and I think that's what most MUAs do, too.  I'm
> fine with wrong dates being shown as long as it's not abusable
> to pin a message to the top of /$INBOX/.

Right, that seems like a good place to draw the line.

> Aside from git-send-email behavior mentioned upthread, Date:
> should also be favored in general because it's consistent across
> recipients, and across independently-run archives w/o common
> history.
>
> I think the best we can do is point out to senders their clocks
> are wrong, as this has been the case going back decades.

Fair enough.  Thanks.