From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS8495 185.67.36.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from mout01.posteo.de (mout01.posteo.de [185.67.36.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B5B1F642 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 21:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=posteo.net header.i=@posteo.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=2017 header.b=E0Ew5EUb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C2F2400DE for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 22:02:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1675630950; bh=14EiuVKKkn2qRKipNP+YDFWHbINdOy8blsWb0kwM9Mo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=E0Ew5EUbzSBXapT+qxHkYuYk9dRbVWsmIQCOGYnrk7uaA7rITBS4oWtIu+HshsQ5f 3xCAVoG2Qdhbxl9geCDkG8ZuG1Ahmkv0XbetGjPbKK2gthLQwnojrjjA4D8SaAn6ep ONUIce72V3M2A3zZu+zlYIjN1rdv0o0lct0NkzHKDQditF3CPcZiX379H5DfRnjKLF 6hN/F8fWCcwu8GKLJoFFHVrHi9Kd7jxv6J3XLXGQhbdNqTx7I/RrcaxLF8bDr04UVL nzWnQovxSgxwmd25IcLQOVKU1o6WBZwNj4gMhC8uqnPbg/fM7m+FWBvwvoCHDxdj4I IDe1rrOXHhY1g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4P92025m2hz6tmB; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 22:02:26 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Eric Wong Cc: Kyle Meyer , meta@public-inbox.org, Bastien Guerry Subject: Re: [PATCH] www: display Received: timestamp for dumped topics In-Reply-To: <20230205202159.M111127@dcvr> References: <87edr5gx63.fsf@kyleam.com> <20230204204110.M179231@dcvr> <87o7q7di5i.fsf@localhost> <87y1pb27r6.fsf@kyleam.com> <20230205202159.M111127@dcvr> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 21:03:01 +0000 Message-ID: <87lelbddve.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Eric Wong writes: >> [FEATURE REQUEST] Timezone support in org-mode datestamps and org-agenda >> 2023-10-29 1:04 UTC (110+ messages) >> ` [POLL] Proposed syntax for [...] >> >> I don't care too much one way or the other, but it makes sense to me for >> that to match the value that's actually used to sort the messages. >> Eric, what about something like this? > > I'm slightly against it. Date: is what's shown in every other > message view, and I think that's what most MUAs do, too. I'm > fine with wrong dates being shown as long as it's not abusable > to pin a message to the top of /$INBOX/. Fair point. The only inconvenience is that update time of the thread will remain in future even when new messages arrive. But it is minor. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at