* can lei require Inline::C?
@ 2021-02-02 10:09 Eric Wong
2021-02-03 0:02 ` Kyle Meyer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Wong @ 2021-02-02 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta
Performance and interactivity suck without being able to use FD
passing (especially tab completions). And having to maintain
and separate code paths is a huge time sink...
Inline::C is packaged by every relevant distro (unlike
Socket::Msghdr), and I figure anybody who uses lei at this stage
will have a C compiler...
It would let us use io-uring and maybe some other things
more easily, too (and I miss hacking in C).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: can lei require Inline::C?
2021-02-02 10:09 can lei require Inline::C? Eric Wong
@ 2021-02-03 0:02 ` Kyle Meyer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Meyer @ 2021-02-03 0:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Wong; +Cc: meta
Eric Wong writes:
> Performance and interactivity suck without being able to use FD
> passing (especially tab completions). And having to maintain
> and separate code paths is a huge time sink...
>
> Inline::C is packaged by every relevant distro (unlike
> Socket::Msghdr), and I figure anybody who uses lei at this stage
> will have a C compiler...
Yeah, I'd figure the same, so my uninformed guess/opinion is that the
separate code paths aren't worth the trouble.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-03 0:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-02 10:09 can lei require Inline::C? Eric Wong
2021-02-03 0:02 ` Kyle Meyer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).