From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246671F4C4; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:34:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=80x24.org; s=selector1; t=1730849675; bh=LeSh7Rvyv+fZjP4W/aD2itHe0JjZZuKIdhmCXxnHBs4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FVjMdwl9HsaCHwTUIuciOO/hH2d3c4+RpV/shp9qSvX9VlPj2XqptwQiuvMWeZGAz geJyHpZpaP4oJ+x4wLSgeKVOzIUt5/oPwYAgENAZD01kbNlir30wodciiidl0QMNlF 3C9QCv5RX0mG+1Uh8s8OiLtRnc/i+wUeLv71h8I0= Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:34:34 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Occasional public-inbox-httpd flakiness Message-ID: <20241105233435.M14575@dcvr> References: <875xp15n3o.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <20241105232445.M291444@dcvr> <87wmhh45uz.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wmhh45uz.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> List-Id: Jonathan Corbet wrote: > There are still definitely successful responses; my guess has always > been that one of the public-inbox-httpd processes has gone weird while > the other still work. Btw, if you're running with the -W switch for multiple workers, you can kill the specific worker and leave the rest of the workers, too.