From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org (sin.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:40e1:4800::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E681F44D for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 17:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=bdPge6OZ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775DBCE195B; Wed, 8 May 2024 17:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93B29C113CC; Wed, 8 May 2024 17:01:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715187661; bh=yIcIect25By+5l9xSTVJF8N1/7X96wDUI0owYNYZGRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bdPge6OZAXT6FYQ9UmtY/IHpEqmhPZEidxOKZhfh6qBXq+3WyJ1jb/rtWi1pG6rR/ Lh3ozTfg2qfvGm1PdJkk/LmuavlEcFvl4tIjA0WZqYIUnNUhdxc5t616hp7GtpkVEt PCQxUIsQcEttmccFJtpq0d24P/89VluAAkAgc4mnoXEDBkYp+WVh8A+GflhjbUJQWt r/wLEuHBZQDCOVjP4AX6uukWS8Hdcufe5X/Wle52m5s54br1A4uibyP79ynEu/o55W i61v9VqOogjRP6EbtERJTZ4oveCD5tTPD7QL9wDOAcP/Y8c+6mJ188xHpmECEKmtNA rlvwFul2blOTg== Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 13:01:00 -0400 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Eric Wong Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , tools@linux.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, meta@public-inbox.org, sashal@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, krzk@kernel.org Subject: Re: filtering stable patches in lore queries Message-ID: <20240508-optimal-peach-bustard-a49160@meerkat> References: <20240427071921.M438650@dcvr> <20240429-antique-hyena-of-glee-d9e4ac@lemur> <20240508113314.M238016@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240508113314.M238016@dcvr> List-Id: On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:33:14AM GMT, Eric Wong wrote: > > I'm whole-heartedly for this! This ties nicely to my b4 work where I'd > > like to be able to identify code-review trailers sent for a specific > > patch, even if that patch itself is not on lore. For example, this could > > be a patch that is part of a pull-request on a git forge, but we'd still > > like to be able to collect and find code-review trailers for it when a > > maintainer applies it. > > OK, a more configurable version is available on a per-inbox basis: > > https://public-inbox.org/meta/20240508110957.3108196-1-e@80x24.org/ > > But that's a PITA to configure with hundreds of inboxes and > doesn't have extindex support, yet. > > I made it share logic with the old altid code; so I'll also be > getting altid into extindex since ISTR users wanting to be able > to lookup gmane stuff via extindex. Great, thanks for doing this. I'll wait until this has extindex support, because I really need to be able to look across all inboxes. > Yeah, though there's 3 ways of indexing strings, currently :x > I've decided to keep some options open and support boolean_term, > text, and phrase for now. What's the difference between "text" and "phrase"? > boolean_term is the cheapest and probably best for exactly > matching labels/enums and such. So, this is for "X-Ignore-Me: Yes" type of headers? -K