From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FDD1F461; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:46:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=80x24.org; s=selector1; t=1710427564; bh=4HMKw4esOqqMYft/e5Sr8ADq1bIGYcOiY1I2c+5OGh8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NiLZZzK6nPdDeybIIagBLlagxUIHndxhjyBVhzNaFc0vPQwVRCJvIPc4/fWhuj9bF DzSr3utfHd6YbIWfMvjAI8B4u0pF2/ztN3FErh3svttvlMdefiJ8xPu0uapjNDxzTs VSa/8bonMo/v0j0n+40FsVZQi+rpFbw6siHz+fEc= Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:46:04 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Gonsolo Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: Lei exception Message-ID: <20240314144604.M774731@dcvr> References: <20240313192022.M410421@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: please keep meta@public-inbox.org in the Cc: Gonsolo wrote: > > Which version of public-inbox is this? It looks like 1.9 based > > on the line number[1]. > > Package from Ubuntu/Debian. > > lei 1.9.0-1 (Ubuntu) > 936c275178dfc6908577487ce97d3a83c58c5449 PublicInbox/LeiSearch.pm OK. > > Any info you can share about the queries you use? (https, local > > public-inbox clones). > > lei edit-search: > [lei "q"] > include = https://lore.kernel.org/all/ > external = 1 > local = 1 > remote = 1 > threads = 1 OK, yeah. I seem to recall problems with http(s) externals being racy and made more reliable with the use of OnDestroy callbacks in public-inbox.git > > I've seen it a few times in the past, but IIRC couldn't reliably > > reproduce it and haven't seen it in a while. I'm always running > > latest , though, and that > > has numerous reliability improvements over 1.9. > > Ok. Maybe I'm going to ping the Debian maintainer. No, please don't ask Debian maintainers to package unreleased versions. The non-lei feature: codesearch, is not ready to be supported in a 2.0 release. The only good news is 2.0 will probably be the last release involving large data model additions/changes.