From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stepnem@smrk.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN:  
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from mail.smrk.net (mail.smrk.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:6c01:2788:5400:4ff:fe27:adaa])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4E01F452
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=smrk.net header.i=@smrk.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221002 header.b=jbpf5SDC;
	dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smrk.net; s=20221002;
	t=1697656682;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=MgbsxLvMgKSc3qhgQazkYdE2r/nvhIrdSxi4LfgK5As=;
	b=jbpf5SDCkj4aZbvVxhu/s7AgafucHNu4Urx8pSkfIl/FX0VKhHhPPvyVTGeOp/JlVS462p
	q2VI1CRB3MZCQjcbum34XRHJ+rxZf6XI2cj078b1qwIqCGNxo/uQi59gNO2napNFiEXBjM
	YSXc+GNkDiwDW7KgyFuDhoKGYYltztt9xXXNcO2AihnP3tpC+iDy46GfpotkVBkgNdHGSQ
	M7Uf4RYaYJd5uwGCiew0zWQL6AyFTPGtetVJU8sjHuFKkU+yoy6P8zdpJe/xSN6Z53Zu5Y
	QTYQuRvo5txlWZD63tT9IroiOLBjGnlXGtTsQEszya1Rtssx7oUdo4s0aTKviQ==
Received: from localhost (<unknown> [192.168.5.2])
	by smrk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 24113065 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
	Wed, 18 Oct 2023 21:18:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= <stepnem@smrk.net>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: imapd.t failing on OpenBSD, bisects to 13a2088c74fd (kqnotify:
 drop EV_CLEAR (edge triggering))
In-Reply-To: <20231018190634.M893199@dcvr>
References: <20231018170111+0200.599564-stepnem@smrk.net>
 <20231018190634.M893199@dcvr>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/30.0.50
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 21:18:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20231018211801+0200.254938-stepnem@smrk.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:06:34 +0000
Eric Wong wrote:

> Odd, can you confirm this is with p5-IO-KQueue installed?

Yes, that's with p5-IO-KQueue-0.39.

> Parallel tests would increase the likelyhood of limits being hit
> (make check, make check-run, prove -j$N)
>
> `make test' and 'prove -lwv' (w/o -j) are serial,
> and `make check-run N=3D1' can force serial tests while
> saving loading overhead.

Hm, thanks.  I've been only using, 'make test' and prove
(no -j) so far, so that's not it.

--=20
=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n