From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN:  
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
	DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63911F55F;
	Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=80x24.org;
	s=selector1; t=1695407925;
	bh=j2hJpchEieYjonLMoRsQXKlphAGwiX8p3HHhFVra1p4=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=msjJ4k5nxwP4wOlbkQt3RmDh9X0u0GQL8OPDlTmDbXxQPrbYKkrnAE9E1JGjjgkQS
	 vXcj0SZNUIbwkB/l2vH4wshnWSja6hwnbcQRRhZ3pJYsDr4aa+Uf5xQJVOXf+QxzgR
	 IGKzdFiwzKUWme6K3Q4KM4xCADmF+vnxBjD/h+1c=
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 18:38:19 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pop3: support initial_limit parameter in mailbox name
Message-ID: <20230922183819.M440592@dcvr>
References: <20230912224034.M689061@dcvr>
 <20230913-tarot-monogamy-2f614c@meerkat>
 <20230914003828.M101484@dcvr>
 <20230915-reputable-maverick-13736d@meerkat>
 <20230915204110.M732304@dcvr>
 <20230918-barrel-unhearing-b63869@meerkat>
 <20230918211422.M309741@dcvr>
 <20230919-buggy-unsent-411b34@meerkat>
 <20230922021817.M698225@dcvr>
 <20230922-overuse-bazooka-c9f21e@meerkat>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230922-overuse-bazooka-c9f21e@meerkat>
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 02:18:17AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] pop3: support initial_limit parameter in mailbox name
> 
> That looks good in my tests. Thanks!
> 
> Tested-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks.  I also forgot to expand on the fix for limit for slice:

    This also fixes an offset calculation bug with limit when used
    on the newest (non-full) slice.  The number of messages in the
    newest slice is now taken into account.

(oops, pushed out without your tested-by :x)