From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0381F55F; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:20:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=80x24.org; s=selector1; t=1694586040; bh=qTXSQsH+ZFOsCz411TJFc4z0cAhKLQ+Svipu7cQwJVs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iYAEcDUiiT5tQhqae9EMOxUT7wWSwGEfjl/NdJkDZ+8B8nPzSBLhA3r/xbKOVRroI eYZKxb7DuJ9SNn53NvlwSiaTddFunihhiMwKKULqRF3aZ7QI7eC2FgvpR67J0VHvjB s4pfVkoOKAaYty5p0CMH3qI2HCbmbdoXue/7cMtg= Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 06:20:40 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: [RFC] pop3: support `?limit=$NUM' parameter in mailbox name Message-ID: <20230913062040.M617670@dcvr> References: <20230912-impart-swinger-4c2434@meerkat> <20230912224034.M689061@dcvr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230912224034.M689061@dcvr> List-Id: Eric Wong wrote: > I'm not sure if `?' or `=' are allowed characters in POP3 > mailbox names. In fact, I can't find any information on > valid characters allowed in RFC 1081 nor RFC 1939. Of course, the parameters and all manner of special characters can also be placed the password, so `anonymous?limit=1000'. But somehow putting parameters in the "password" (even a well-known and obvious one) feels wrong. *shrug*