From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS20473 45.76.80.0/20 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from mail.smrk.net (mail.smrk.net [45.76.87.244]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B5A21F406 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 17:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=smrk.net header.i=@smrk.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221002 header.b=G+sPEsuy; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smrk.net; s=20221002; t=1693502810; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2BrROV7juA8PP3dsh3HhAYUVCsHyiDW3uPWyVLs5tCY=; b=G+sPEsuyoeJTEm8WnWIyLxY8xYfFjhQupgfoieDkxJpYkp8uWQ2K/iDyZV3iLeHd+4GOxb XbgcJqOu5pbwitOIOd7Ffj3OrdFuuxEFl8Reu/1U6SIOUx0VI/dKe8/hv+NLrFYxZHSB+U w+DGeMSHPc1GaRthKPVKzgoZWlmil71iKJAVkL8A8X2zK9w3Z+nxOP2CKx7q2nGNKSDjDp GUoty4yL583eYv/1BLkxshJ+CnSRb4EqOpD4fcxZJnCeNvBzbert8N3vDcTHRx/bj/PS+j eDhSmA6ULupQyu+BaHGU/01b+0WqyDn/o4wGCXaDOEPAIdmNjJedQzIpMbiP0Q== Received: from localhost ( [192.168.5.2]) by smrk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4fc9f557 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:26:50 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= To: Eric Wong Cc: meta@public-inbox.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] various build fixes + OpenBSD compat, [PATCH 7/7] xap_helper.h: fix double-free on OpenBSD hdestroy In-Reply-To: <20230831111152+0200.360729-stepnem@smrk.net> References: <20230830051045.330641-1-e@80x24.org> <20230830051045.330641-1-e@80x24.org> <20230830143409+0200.929541-stepnem@smrk.net> <20230830211849.M275594@dcvr> <20230831111152+0200.360729-stepnem@smrk.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.37 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 19:26:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20230831192650+0200.929387-stepnem@smrk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:11:52 +0200 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 21:18:49 +0000 > Eric Wong wrote: > >> What's lei-import-http.t stuck on? I haven't seen that... > > Have you tried without p5-Inline? I installed it now and the test passes. Ah, I see now that PERFORMANCE NOTES in lei-overview.pod says Inline::C is required, so perhaps just some adjustments to the test skipping/diagnostics and INSTALL instructions (which say Inline::C is optional) would be helpful? --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n