From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stepnem@smrk.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS20473 45.76.80.0/20
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from mail.smrk.net (mail.smrk.net [45.76.87.244])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8F11F406
	for <meta@public-inbox.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 21:22:50 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=smrk.net header.i=@smrk.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20221002 header.b=Drs6MEUt;
	dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smrk.net; s=20221002;
	t=1693257768;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=OkgCmM6tE+shZKLZcJV7VDhdld9q3Wb3t9oQ/fkwFvQ=;
	b=Drs6MEUtUvwqEXdRpx+mTr/8smrAyL67OTKQxG+YY7FhUirhWxSp9fF86raaVymz31KR6M
	d4JRtQhW63z31xllfTr2fmhWx/twzp08HWoX7ee7+2pAyErv9PndGzO5lpKnHjhTqtctiA
	WiXJw15iQZtbVIzdD7xhQ1JsdfpT4m/VrHI9pDmrJ4bKEJ3omN2TDQhNmJ+1kjVeoEhFTS
	cBUwpmJLlR3c89iF3rStdtkYAToopofMVCOLUBmWJLCMUG6y3PD8L1qp2OzvpEjwnTjoF5
	SKNjqbu4mQrrIfT0caJ3yVTU+XZCFkGaX/NPO1v7W0FKXG97VUD/2lJwsZY+4Q==
Received: from localhost (<unknown> [192.168.5.2])
	by smrk (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 13cc7d91 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO);
	Mon, 28 Aug 2023 23:22:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= <stepnem@smrk.net>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Fix some typos/grammar/errors in docs and comments
In-Reply-To: <20230828211154.M621959@dcvr>
References: <20230828104246.936281-1-stepnem@smrk.net>
 <20230828104246.936281-5-stepnem@smrk.net> <20230828211154.M621959@dcvr>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.37 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/30.0.50
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 23:22:47 +0200
Message-ID: <20230828232247+0200.172961-stepnem@smrk.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 21:11:54 +0000
Eric Wong wrote:

> Perhaps something like the following is clearer?
>
> -Well-known TCP ports automatically get TLS or STARTTLS support
> -If using systemd-compatible socket activation and a TCP listener
> -on port well-known ports (563 is inherited, it is automatically
> -NNTPS when this option is given.  When a listener on port 119 is
> -inherited and this option is given, it automatically gets
> -STARTTLS support.
> +Well-known TCP ports automatically get TLS or STARTTLS support if using
> +systemd-compatible socket activation.  That is, ports 443, 563, 993, and
> +995 support HTTPS, NNTPS, IMAPS, and POP3S, respectively; while ports
> +110, 119, and 143 support STARTTLS on POP3, NNTP, and IMAP,
> +respectively.

Crystal clear, thank you!  Maybe add "With this option, [well-known...]"
at the beginning, to avoid any possible confusion (it should go without
saying, but being explicit doesn't hurt (and the original had it, too
("this option is given"))).

--=20
=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n