From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <e@80x24.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN:  
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
	DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4AB1F452;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=80x24.org;
	s=selector1; t=1681212452;
	bh=KAZj5plBeM21paKVE8Hac0hLO93F6HMKJuvduNveVKU=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=kqRfiOAteqD1YsyaS5L/f7uFSO6nkFqdo/aYW/p7XaUhWtrvurppxFTSPWTpch1Hr
	 BEeZlTzj6CcYGnGZCAe+Ye1StkpJkXIWQJ7Qw20kCHoQcnfMK/J+1//CUFB6mxaO4j
	 mI9SH7DRSXlWDTg5PBvh2D5L/3rEop3Ov2pE5QOc=
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:27:32 +0000
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: meta@public-inbox.org
Subject: Re: Cheap way to check for new messages in a thread
Message-ID: <20230411112732.M354729@dcvr>
References: <20230327213849.M743623@dcvr>
 <euqfjyjedoywqdcbldq23o3k3joewdmnx5j3tsjcu2dfx253uj@mzrjrpfy5nxv>
 <20230328194549.M808175@dcvr>
 <20230328-monsoon-charred-giver-91f26d3024fb@meerkat>
 <20230328220830.M352242@dcvr>
 <20230328-oppressed-almighty-61330f9dde22@meerkat>
 <20230329212558.M622984@dcvr>
 <20230330112951.M493025@dcvr>
 <20230330-service-handmade-0295eec6336f@meerkat>
 <20230331014043.M854258@dcvr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230331014043.M854258@dcvr>
List-Id: <meta.public-inbox.org>

Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> wrote:
> Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > I can't easily test this, because lore is currently mostly on 1.9 and the
> > patch doesn't cleanly apply to that tree. However, I will be happy to test it
> > out once 2.0 is out and we've updated to it on our systems.
> 
> Fwiw, master is good on Linux for mail.

Erm, almost :x   The --batch-command support added a difficult-to-trigger bug
that went undetected for a few months:

  https://public-inbox.org/meta/20230411112350.297099-1-e@80x24.org/
  ("git: fix cat_async_retry")